P8P67 Pro or P8P67 Deluxe?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

roscolo

Distinguished
Nov 9, 2010
187
0
18,690
I don't see much difference in the P8P67 Pro and P8P67 Deluxe. I will only have one GPU, I need a PCI slot to run an old SCSI card / scanner. Do some gaming, some video editing, but vast majority of my work is Photoshop and Lightroom. Will either be using i5 2500k or i7 2600k, probably i5 2500k as the i7 doesn't look to be much better.

I'm leaning towards the Pro version of the board. Any reason I should consider Deluxe?
 
Yeah. Honestly, just for my imaging work I could just add RAM and update to a 64bit OS and solve most of my problems. I'm still running XP 32bit on my imaging workstation because it, well it works and does what I need to do, although some batch processing in Lightroom seems to really drag on this machine now. But I have fairly regular Photoshop crashes now as well that I'm doing A LOT of wide format custom printing for clients. Get RAM error messages now but that is more an XP issue. I'll still multi-boot 32bit XP in any situation just because I do run some older hardware that may or may not play nice with Windows 7. For that matter I'll keep my old system intact.

Sounds like your situation is a little different than mine, but I appreciate the advice you've given here and earlier as well. You already steered me clear of a GPU mistake I was about to make and turned me on to something I knew nothing about. You're right, this system isn't make or break by any stretch. Most of my work is architectural photography and wide-format printing. But I apply a pretty conservative bent to every purchase just as habit. 20 years in and I'm doing OK in this business, and I've watched MANY of my compadres fold over the years due in no small part to buying the "latest and greatest" because they, ahem, "needed" it to "grow." For example I still shoot large format film for my images that will be printed really large. To get the digital equivalent I would need to spend about $30,000 - $40,000. $30K buys a lot of film. Some of the environments I work in don't play nice with batteries or electricity, and if I drop a film back into a river or off a parking deck I'm not out $30K. So, I could pay $30K for something that doesn't even work as well FOR ME. These are the mistakes I've seen some very skilled and talented photogs make and went under in no small part due to these sorts of rationalized purchases. No, a computer or workstation alone isn't going to do that, but I've noticed folks who are loose with the purse strings on little things are usually habitual violators and are loose with the larger purchases as well. Being an independent freelance anything usually means the lean operations survive. Man I've seen some really talented big spenders perish, especially over the last 5 years.

So I tend to probably do a little too much research on every purchase. But, I usually end up with good stuff that does what I need it to do, and I have enough knowledge to do most of the work myself. Sometimes just enough knowledge to screw things up. But, after a couple of screw-ups I can do it all myself. Know plenty of folks who went broke always paying other people to do things they should have learned how to do themselves, too. No excuse for that in this day and age, what with the inter-tubes and all.
 
I have my wife on an i7 930 + SSD + RAID 1 set-up and for what she does it's a joke; Outlook, Business data, Word... My thought was it will last and serve her very well for at least 3~5 years. She does like the 'instant' document finding/opening, but I could have saved 50% and have no real loss to her time.

Trust me, 'I get money.' I get 'research.' I take you as no fool, and if anything I get people to really think and try to point them in the best direction possible!

If I were you then my priorities would be a FAST SSD, the fastest are PCIe based and in excess of 700MB/s and a good GPU; beyond 'pokey' SATA2 and yep faster than SATA3 - trying to be funny. The CPU is important but without 'fast everything else' it is unbalanced. Running ~ 5GHz waiting on data to load -- think about it, even a fast SSD is by far the slowest thing in a rig. I'm looking forward to 'reliable' enterprise SSD over hot/noisy/expensive but reliable SAS.

Fast SSDs -> http://www.newegg.com/Product/Productcompare.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100008120%2050001550&IsNodeId=1&page=3&bop=And&CompareItemList=636|20-227-597^20-227-597-TS,20-227-578^20-227-578-TS,20-227-598^20-227-598-TS,20-227-659^20-227-659-TS,20-227-660^20-227-660-TS

It's as strong or as fast as the weakest link.

More to digest. :)
 
Heh, those ought to be called FAST RAID SSD's, cause that's what they are. 4 onboard SF controllers in four-way RAID 0, running in a 4x PCIe slot.

That could be problematic with multi GPU setups. Not sure I'd want my data so close to the heat from one GTX 580 SC, much less 2- and that's IF it would all fit on the MB. But in a server situation, way cool. Sick throughput.
 
ASUS P8P67 PRO Blue/Grey for GPU(s), Black PCIe x4 SSD.
Specs:
{GPU}2 x PCIe 2.0 x16 (single at x16 or dual at x8/x8 mode)
{SSD}1 x PCIe 2.0 x16 * [Black] (max. at x4 mode, compatible with PCIe x1 and x4 devices)

Nope, the RevoDrive will work fine, it's PCIe x4. I'm not suggesting that you 'store' your photos on it, but I'm suggesting that the {OS + Apps + Scratch + Working Images} are stored on it. Yes, it's RAID 0 internally, but don't compare it to buying 4 SSDs and running them off your MOBO 'cheap' onboard RAID; it's night and day different.

I'm looking at a [strike]256GB[/strike] 240GB RevoDrive for my home/office rigs on an X68. I plan on using them as testing drives for SQL comparisons; we're constantly refining PHP code - so I compare a server compile to WS 'test code' compile and write additional code to compare the 2 results.

RevoDrive or not I would strongly look at utilizing SSD. Typical 'new' SATA3 SSDs are 300MB/s+ Read & ~200MB/s+ Write or twice the speed of an HDD ~140 MB/s and never fragment - period; it's N/A in solid state.
 
I wouldn't go x58... i mean why opt for a dead socket? not to upset any x58 owners, it's still a very powerful setup, don't get me wrong, but you're going to see one last cpu for it if i'm correct. the 990X? or was that just a rumour?

I myself am going for SB... Ivy and bulldozer sounds more server based really. I can't see 8 cores of being any use just yet, or within the next two years (for what i do).

as for the SSD/HD debate. i'm with you, but then, you could just stack your PC full of RAM and have windows cache the lot. thus reducing HD activity. we do that at work on our out of date progress DB to help with queries. sure, just means you need to leave your pc on FOREVER to get any benefits. lawllol.

my two cents.

Upgrading from a q9550.
 


EXACTLY what he said. You're not a hardcore gamer or overclocker, so I'd recommend the i5 2500K (not getting the K is just a waste of money, as the difference in price is about -> . <- so small), with the standard P8P67 motherboard. You are running one GPU, so extra PCI-E slots are unneeded. Also, you can use the saved money on that single GPU and then get a bit better GFX card to last you a few months longer.
 
asus_p8p67_spec.jpg


Unless you plan to OC or use SLI, the standard P8P67 seems to be enough.
 


Don't plan to OC or use SLI, but would like to keep those options available in the future, so I'm leaning towards the P8P67 Pro. The i5 2500k bundle deal is gone from Microcenter now and Newegg is sold out of the pros, so while I wait I guess I'll see what other P67 boards emerge in the next month or so.
 
Hey, The only reason I would suggest you go to Deluxe version is, if you have spare $$$ and you dont know how to spend it... See, the deluxe is not bad, but not THAT much better than Pro, as it adds just few more features, which you can happily ignore most of the time. If you have money, if you want better performance, spend it on good GPU. Else if you want faster PC, spend it on SSD. Dont waste on spending money for just a few more specs which actually doesnt bring boost to your system.
Be wise, choose Wise

Arun.S