This review is not really objective.
There are important things left out. One thing the author hides quite well is he's using dual channel memory for the 1366 platform (based on the configuration, unless he left something out), instead of triple channel. Stating this makes no difference, against what other benchmarks show isn't convincing. Then he states LGA1156 overclock better, whereas it's become common knowledge they do not overclock as high, and they require more voltage at the same clock speed.
Normally, you write a supposition with supporting facts. We get supposition followed by supposition.
A few other things. This N200 slows down the motherboard when using one card in almost all situations. Not a big deal if you are really going to be using more than one all the time, and it's not a lot, but it's worth mentioning.
It does add power use and cost. Why wasn't a power use test done? Obviously, this is still an inferior setup to x58, but if the power use and cost is a lot less, maybe it's good for some people. But, neither data points were included. But probably once you add this thing in, both power use and cost go up quite a bit.
Again, keeping mind the incomplete data, the suppositions without supporting facts, and the skewed benchmarking where the x58 was run in dual channel mode instead of triple channel (which is how most people will run these systems, obviously), this review does not convince, although it does show the N200 can be effective. But at what costs?