PCs out of Balance - Need some Help

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Michael Scott Brown wrote:
> The basis for defining poisoning the well *as a variant of ad hominem*
> is exactly as I have cited.

Bullshit. Once again, you get basic definitions wrong, even when they're
quoted to you. Are all your new shoes worn at the heels?
--
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

"Bradd W. Szonye" <bradd+news@szonye.com> wrote in message
news:slrnd77c5p.23a.bradd+news@szonye.com...
> Michael Scott Brown wrote:
> > The basis for defining poisoning the well *as a variant of ad hominem*
> > is exactly as I have cited.
>
> Bullshit. Once again, you get basic definitions wrong, even when they're
> quoted to you.

Stop lying to the newsgroup, Bradd.
There is a difference between the definition of poisoning the well and
why
(a) 'poisoning the well' actions are ad hominem fallacies (as it is
defined by humans)
(b) 'poisoning the well' actions are ad hominem fallacies (as defined by
rules-of-argument)

Your cite of the definition was irrelevant to the argument at hand. You
have a remarkable deficiency with understanding the relevance of your own
sources. Stop shaming yourself.

-Michael

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Bradd wrote:
>> Once again, you get basic definitions wrong, even when they're quoted
>> to you.

Michael "Juicebag" Brown wrote:
> Stop lying to the newsgroup, Bradd.

Tsk, tsk. If you bothered to learn what you're talking about, you
wouldn't make this kind of mistake.
--
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Michael Scott Brown wrote:
> <chris.spol@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1114807203.610241.75070@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> > MSB wrote:

> > > But if that's _not_ the purpose of such comments, and not the
> > > _effect_ of such comments, then the basis for an accusation of
> > > poisoning the well *vanishes*.

> > That's like you saying you didn't intend to say something stupid,
and
> > everyone saw through your stupidity, therefore what you said wasn't
> > stupid.
>
> Nice strawman, bitch.

Analogy, dipshit.

 

[Guest]

Archived from groups: rec.games.frp.dnd (More info?)

Michael "Scarecrow" Brown wrote:
> This Goslinism thing is apparently infectious.

As you've amply demonstrated.
--
Bradd W. Szonye
http://www.szonye.com/bradd