Pentium D 960 @4.16 GHz vs QUAD CORE Q6700 @ 2.66 GHz in games

[iluvgillgill]

i think we've knifed that guy enough now!lol

 

[Evilonigiri]

Hell, I'd say a Phenom does remarkably better than any Pentium. And that's saying a lot.

 

[shadowthor]

lol, i think hes starting to get the point across his head.

 

[iluvgillgill]

i thnk that guy's brain overloaded with our "helpful" info!lol tough luck.revise next time before speak.

 

[shadowthor]

Maybe its time he upgraded, at least he have more cores to sort out the "helpful" info. lol

 

[iluvgillgill]

yeah. i wonder if his brain can do multi thread or the old Hyper thread?lol

 

[sirsanio]

bahaha, this was funny!
I just "upgraded" my stone old workstation to a Pentium D 960 and 8gb ram and was browsing when i found this thread!
thanks for the amusement!

 

[mRt0x1c]

Haha dud are you serious comparing Core 2 Quad to a Prescott Dual Core (EXTREME NETVURST) or Presler anyways the Pentium d you have has the power of a Intel Celeron 440,dud ofc the pentium 3 quad core is alot better then netburst crap,Pentium D is 2x Pentium 4,Core 2 Quad is 4x OC-ed Pentium 3-s with some more improvements it not only runs cooler and faster it is a quad core,get a pentium d if you want to run the latest games to play them really good get a quad by the way Cores also meather in games if you have a 460GTX for example if you have that old crap 9800GTX it really dosent make a diffrence get a Core i3 pc its much much much faster then you netburst crap