Hello,
I am sending back a new HP Pavilion high end performance system because it does not support a RAID 0 array.
I have a replacement order set up with a 2TB hard drive split into two 1 TB hard drives set up as RAID 0. -- Which I chose after watching an Adobe TV video that explicitly recommended this for optimal HD video editing.
I then read multiple web video editing forum posts NOT recommending RAID O - and saying it was a myth that it's faster, but it is much more risky (for obvious potential double disk data loss reasons).
So I became very confused as to whether my replacement order was going to need a replacement! :>
Anyway, I was glad to read the comment which I pasted below on this forum, since it validated the original Adobe TV recommendation to use a RAID 0 set up FOR HD multi-stacked-clip or composite EDITING.
I am willing to take the drive failure/data loss risk if it's truly worth it. IF so, please do specify how best to partition the drive for Adobe CS5.5 video editing (in PP & AE).
However, if it's equally speed-optimal to set up 2 separate internal hard drives as a scratch disk to edit on in CS5.5, and have a main drive just for applications, I'd probably opt for that set up instead. -- BTW, I'm assuming a RAID 0 can be set up as a single scratch disk fro Adobe editing aps, but I'm not entirely sure, since I'm a very recent convert from Final Cut Pro to Adobe for video editing.
I would love to get your opinion before I revise my replacement order.
(Specs: Intel 6 multi-core processor with high end new Nvidia Graphics card and 18 gig RAM)
...This is my once every 5 year update, so you can imagine how out of date my former system was. I also can not afford to make a major mistake.
IF the RAID 0 main drive/second drive split will truly create an enormous speed boast (and is not a myth), I would not mind taking the risk, but if getting an application dedicated main drive and 2 secondary RAID 0's will work as scratch disks for Adobe and be just as fast then I'd go that route. -- If so, what drive (brand/speed/size) would you recommend that I use for this set up?
Thanks very much in advance and I will eagerly await your insight!
______ ORIGINAL FORUM COMMENT PASTED BELOW:
"If you don't mind the risk and want better speed with booting up and opening programs, you can just use Raid 0 for the OS, Apps, page file and media cache. If you do this, you will definitely need to create a separate partition for the OS+Apps as C and a D partition for page file and an E partition for media cache. I can help you with the exact sizes of those partitions once we know the amount of ram and which Raid 0 or 1 for the OS+Apps.
I can also provide you with step-by-step instructions for setting up Raid on an Intel board as I have done so for several others."
I am sending back a new HP Pavilion high end performance system because it does not support a RAID 0 array.
I have a replacement order set up with a 2TB hard drive split into two 1 TB hard drives set up as RAID 0. -- Which I chose after watching an Adobe TV video that explicitly recommended this for optimal HD video editing.
I then read multiple web video editing forum posts NOT recommending RAID O - and saying it was a myth that it's faster, but it is much more risky (for obvious potential double disk data loss reasons).
So I became very confused as to whether my replacement order was going to need a replacement! :>
Anyway, I was glad to read the comment which I pasted below on this forum, since it validated the original Adobe TV recommendation to use a RAID 0 set up FOR HD multi-stacked-clip or composite EDITING.
I am willing to take the drive failure/data loss risk if it's truly worth it. IF so, please do specify how best to partition the drive for Adobe CS5.5 video editing (in PP & AE).
However, if it's equally speed-optimal to set up 2 separate internal hard drives as a scratch disk to edit on in CS5.5, and have a main drive just for applications, I'd probably opt for that set up instead. -- BTW, I'm assuming a RAID 0 can be set up as a single scratch disk fro Adobe editing aps, but I'm not entirely sure, since I'm a very recent convert from Final Cut Pro to Adobe for video editing.
I would love to get your opinion before I revise my replacement order.
(Specs: Intel 6 multi-core processor with high end new Nvidia Graphics card and 18 gig RAM)
...This is my once every 5 year update, so you can imagine how out of date my former system was. I also can not afford to make a major mistake.
IF the RAID 0 main drive/second drive split will truly create an enormous speed boast (and is not a myth), I would not mind taking the risk, but if getting an application dedicated main drive and 2 secondary RAID 0's will work as scratch disks for Adobe and be just as fast then I'd go that route. -- If so, what drive (brand/speed/size) would you recommend that I use for this set up?
Thanks very much in advance and I will eagerly await your insight!
______ ORIGINAL FORUM COMMENT PASTED BELOW:
"If you don't mind the risk and want better speed with booting up and opening programs, you can just use Raid 0 for the OS, Apps, page file and media cache. If you do this, you will definitely need to create a separate partition for the OS+Apps as C and a D partition for page file and an E partition for media cache. I can help you with the exact sizes of those partitions once we know the amount of ram and which Raid 0 or 1 for the OS+Apps.
I can also provide you with step-by-step instructions for setting up Raid on an Intel board as I have done so for several others."