G
Guest
Guest
Archived from groups: comp.sys.intel,alt.comp.hardware.overclocking.amd,comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware.chips,uk.comp.homebuilt (More info?)
"Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@darkstar.prodigy.com> wrote in message
news:haA4d.12332$jS1.3503@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>
> I have serious doubts that fps makes any difference after you reach the
> limits of the human eye, say 70 fps max and 40 fps typical. So it has
> become more of a bragging thing than anything else. There's a limit on the
> rate of the monitor as well, which people tend to ignore when comparing.
> If the monitor is doing 70 refresh that 150-200 fps you see in a benchmark
> is ONLY seen in the benchmark.
>
<SNIP SIGNATURE>
You're not a Doom 3 fan I take it?
Carlo
"Bill Davidsen" <davidsen@darkstar.prodigy.com> wrote in message
news:haA4d.12332$jS1.3503@newssvr31.news.prodigy.com...
>
> I have serious doubts that fps makes any difference after you reach the
> limits of the human eye, say 70 fps max and 40 fps typical. So it has
> become more of a bragging thing than anything else. There's a limit on the
> rate of the monitor as well, which people tend to ignore when comparing.
> If the monitor is doing 70 refresh that 150-200 fps you see in a benchmark
> is ONLY seen in the benchmark.
>
<SNIP SIGNATURE>
You're not a Doom 3 fan I take it?
Carlo