FWIW, in my opinion, having looked at and spoken with Luke IN DEPTH regarding that list, it is laughable
can i just say this is absolutely laughable? you have literally called me out for snob for giving evidence, don't take that i work with good foreign reviewers which you refuse to look at because of your bias to Jon/Tass/Aris and can't look at tweakpc for example, while they are sponsored by Chroma for their good work and work with similar tools.
One thing is for certain. Nobody ever bought a crappy power supply if the followed the recommendations on the first page of this thread. Quite a few people have purchased trash following that tier list, because there are some very questionable units listed in positions that they should never, ever, be listed on. End of story.
except those people that skipped FSP, be quiet, chieftec, some evga psus, cooler master, Thermaltake, aerocool, HEC, Sharkoon and simply just ones that you don't list because you set them in a dark spot.
The only difference between the corsair CV 2019 and VS 2017 is the efficiency
for 450 and 550, correct. the 650 is based off the cougar lx/be quiet system power 9/cooler master masterwatt platform.
S12iii on paper looks like a more modern PSU than an S12ii. Sounds great, until you realize that this PSU is not actually made my SeaSonic and actually some Asian company with a poor reputation. I can't even pronounce the name.
that "asian company" is called RSY, and also produces part of S12ii, M12ii and Superflower's PSUs. the only reason they have a bad reputation here is because of what happened with B3 early on.
Honestly, LTT likes to hate on SeaSonic for issues that really aren't that important. For example early SeaSonic Focus power supplies had an issue that really wasn't severe but seasonic adressed and fixed with all new units, yet the people at ltt still act as the issue exists
maybe it's good for you to know that I work on this kind of stuff WITH seasonic. I have a rep i talk to often around their PSUs, and they provide me the info i need as far as I could. I have nothing against them.
Just a little unrelated note, I find it quite sad that the early CX PSUs were based on Seasonic S12ii and then they later swapped platforms to Great Wall and degraded quality for the 2012 models.
cwt... and the 750w/850w versions actually used the same PUQ-B platform as the 2015/2017 CXM. the old one wasn't actually s12ii, but rather S12, as said by Jon himself in the CX/CXM cheat sheet.
Yet LTT only cares about performance and not potential reliability concerns, so the S12iii is placed higher than an S12ii.
no, i care about protections, and s12ii has no 12v uvp, hence it's placed there. but people here don't seem to understand what can happen without that. here you can see why I don't recommend it for example: some crossload data from a Russian reviewer, since the prefered ones either got lost or don't have crossload data.
https://ru.gecid.com/power/seasonic_s12ii-620_bronze_ss-620gb_2015/?s=all
https://ru.gecid.com/power/seasonic_s12ii-520_bronze_ss-520gb_2015/?s=all
now it can happen as that is why we are seeing 12V only PSUs coming out, but I still feel this is unrealistic.
is it? a very low load on minor and high on 12v is actually a very usual load...
Seems to happen with cards like 980ti, 970 as well.
I haven't heard of it with 970, only 980ti.
this was only the 970 strix and focus in earlier batches due to an oversensitive OCP.
with that there have been recent changes to position of the "psus i hate" to move them just below tier a, if they have minor issues like focus and G3 had. with that there have recently been changes to G5 that you probably have missed, fixing the earlier ripple issues.
then, to the fun part. calling my list a joke is outright offending, your behavior has been to me just because i made that list and have tried to defend me this way. making a huge drama around it just because someone links it here and removing the link just because you don't want it to be seen here because you don't agree with 3 placements just makes it worse. I work with foreign reviewers as long as i can see their data make sense, but there is also a very common chance that things are just the same platform, which reviews can show and let me place them along the possibly better tested units at your prefered sites.
but hey, there's a reason i call this thread a joke as well