scryer_360
Distinguished
Thing about magazines is that the information they cover (as pointed out in the article) is released online anyway. Even if its "exclusive" news, it eventually makes its way to the web via fair use laws and such.
So for tech: of course I do. bwah?- the response of my cubicle mate. The thing is, online sites tend to carry whats popular, and by that I mean, what everyone else is reporting. But tech magazines have to work harder than that to get their viewers. Think Popular Science, Popular Mechanics and the like. Every time I open one of those I see something Toms, CNET, Engadget and the like haven't even mentioned yet. A few days later it might be all over the blogosphere then the net though.
I don't subscribe to PC mags because I haven't yet found one that is actively searching for the next big thing. They are just reporting information thats already outdated by the next publication. Popular Science and Popular Mechanics however are always trying to find the stuff that hasn't gotten hyped yet. Even websites dedicated to such things don't quite get it like those two do.
If a PC Mag wants me to subscribe, it needs to be able to find things that websites aren't. And because a PC is such a known quantity and everyone knows the players, it will be hard for PC Websites to do that. Popular Science and Popular Mechanics though don't have that limitation: one issue can be about car tech, the next PC tech, the next camping tech, and on and on and mix it inbetween.
Even Toms doesn't do it like they do.
So for tech: of course I do. bwah?- the response of my cubicle mate. The thing is, online sites tend to carry whats popular, and by that I mean, what everyone else is reporting. But tech magazines have to work harder than that to get their viewers. Think Popular Science, Popular Mechanics and the like. Every time I open one of those I see something Toms, CNET, Engadget and the like haven't even mentioned yet. A few days later it might be all over the blogosphere then the net though.
I don't subscribe to PC mags because I haven't yet found one that is actively searching for the next big thing. They are just reporting information thats already outdated by the next publication. Popular Science and Popular Mechanics however are always trying to find the stuff that hasn't gotten hyped yet. Even websites dedicated to such things don't quite get it like those two do.
If a PC Mag wants me to subscribe, it needs to be able to find things that websites aren't. And because a PC is such a known quantity and everyone knows the players, it will be hard for PC Websites to do that. Popular Science and Popular Mechanics though don't have that limitation: one issue can be about car tech, the next PC tech, the next camping tech, and on and on and mix it inbetween.
Even Toms doesn't do it like they do.