[citation][nom]svenolsen[/nom]Okay MrF430 -Let me break it down to you, since you're calling me "high and mighty."You called him Blind or Moronic -- was it necessary to flame and insult him like that? You say "when someone says something totally irrelevant to back their argument"--right... And those things are relevant. As if he were blind he would have been able to look at the picture of Ballmer to begin with? Is it just me or are you being a hypocrite?Then you call him either a Nix user Or a Mac user but conveniently left out a Windows user. Why? Because Windows users are high and mighty like yourself? That gives you the right to go dissing people?Heh, of course I can argue with you because your posts fall flat because of the ridiculous posting behavior you're showing in the first few posts. Now you're trying to come across legitimate with the past above? "Chances are he can be a Win user as well, however, if I and/or anyone else I know were to complain about a product or service, we would at least have some information to back up our complaint. Not just say that it SUX!"How long have you been around the computing scene my friend? Long enough to know that people of all kinds have been saying "it just sux!" for anything? And this short, unprofound statement has been tossed around within the Windows community itself for ages, BSODs to other things."Everyone is entitled to their opinion, if you think I'm a douche, than so be it, no skin off my nose."Really? Then why do you have to lash out at the guy for expressing his "opinion"? Because you deem it to be baseless, and therefore suddenly self justify to toss around names at the guy? You sound so calm in this new post, yet in your response to him, not only did you post three times, you became offensive against him as well as defensive against yourself and appearing like an idiot.Let me clarify: whether or not you ARE an idiot, you certainly APPEARED like one.[/citation]
Ok, I don't think that you are quite grasping my point here. His statement was totally irrelevant! Maybe it was a bit harsh of me to say the things I did, but, I don't think that it was without merit, and no I was not being a hypocrite one bit, you just choose to nitpick at what I said and blow it out of proportion!
Yes, as you put it I, CONVENIENTLY left out the possibility that he could be a win user because I believe win users are high and mighty like myself (/sarcasm)! Now, if you look down at the 5th paragraph in your post where you quoted part of my previous post, you will see a clear explanation as to why I believe that he is not a win user! But instead of actually reading to see why I said what I did, you just decided to not deal with it and start your captain save a ho rant! Well good job captain!
"Heh, of course I can argue with you because your posts fall flat because of the ridiculous posting behavior you're showing in the first few posts. Now you're trying to come across legitimate with the past above?"
^ Again, the first post could have been a bit harsh, but it was far from ridiculous. My posts have been very legitimate from the first to the current, however some people just like to argue for the sake of arguing!
Yes my friend, I have been around the computing scene for quite some time, maybe more than you, maybe less! I remember getting very familiar with Windows 2.03 on my old 386 Packard Bell! I have gone through the ups and downs of Windows! I hated certain versions of Windows and yes I would say that they sucked and I can tell you EXACTLY why!
And finally, as I mentioned, everyone is entitled to their opinion. However if they step into a DISCUSSION FORUM and are unable to provide any reasoning behind their opinion, then, their opinion does not belong. What if I were to go into any random discussion and say XYZ person place or thing sux! Followed with nothing at all! You better believe that people would call me a troll and maybe say things that are worse than what I said, or maybe not as bad as what I said. Bottom line though, is that people wouldn't be happy about it.
Oh and btw, I posted it 3 times because the first 2 times did not get the bulk of the message posted. Just look at it and it would make sense, definitely not something to call someone out on, but then the captains gotta look for something to do right?...