If the ARM PC can't do all the things an x86 PC can do, it's only Microsoft's fault.
It means their x86_64 to armv9 wrapper systems are unfinished.
I've got news for you, it will never be "finished". Apple is on it's 4th generation and it's not finished.
The PC themselves are not at fault...
Well, except for the fact that they aren't designed for the programs that people are using. Only for the OS they are using. It's not as fine a distinction as you think.
I would definitely buy an ARM PC if I had to, to get rid of obsolete x86, and open the way for a CPU market where REAL competition exists.
Real competition has existed since x86 has. The first CPU I installed was in an IBM PC v.2 I was repairing and was an x86 clone made by NEC. While NEC and many others have dropped out over the decades, there has always been competition.
When/if Nvidia release their desktop class ARM CPU at the end of the year to build gamer ARM PCs, things will change significantly.
It might be interesting, but consider that gaming is actually the hardest thing you can attempt in this space. It may take many, many years before we're comfortable buying a ARM gaming rig.
We just need to be a little bit patient.
Yeah, or a LOT patient. ARM was designed to be efficient. Younger people don't understand that the first RISC "revolution" happened in the 90's. IBM lost HUGE on it, only it's excellent ThinkPad laptops kept it in the PC business at all until it sold out to Lenovo. So, I'm still skeptical.
The interesting thing is that Apple can do it because of it's walled garden. It could, for instance be done in business where the computers are managed, and installed software is tightly controlled, but business is the
most skeptical of ARM laptops right now. If you have worked in corporate IT you know why.