[citation][nom]dragonsqrrl[/nom]There are a few significant issues with this GPU in particular (and a good portion of AMD's high-end mobile graphics solutions) that would keep me from considering them as a viable option for a desktop replacement, but it certainly isn't raw performance. OpenGL and switchable graphics. For some reason AMD restricts OpenGL acceleration to Intel IGP and other integrated solutions, and there's no way to manually switch or force dGPU acceleration. I have no idea why they would do this, but apparently AMD believes IGP's are sufficient for OpenGL, which couldn't be further from reality. Adobe software, especially After Effects, run absolutely terribly, as do CAD programs. This is a huge area where Nvidia Optimus has a significant advantage. AMD just doesn't have a compelling switchable graphics solution (or any at all in many cases) for their high-end mobile GPU's, where the benefits are most dramatic and where this technology is needed most.[/citation]
News to me. It sounds good. You seem pretty reliable as I recognize your handle from previous comments sections.
All I know is more cores at a slower speed can beat less cores at a higher speed, and maybe even vice versa. Let's leave it up to the uninformed consumers with huge wallets to eeni meeni miney mo it and we'll chat over the sales figures. 😀