Radeon R9 290X Review: AMD's Back In Ultra-High-End Gaming

Page 13 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.


If you are trying to troll the you have succeded 100%.
Temperature is irrelevant in o/c, really??? And we don't know if it will kill the card, cause they didn't release it yet, in the stores for the masses to get the card.
And I didnt compared it with HOF, I compared it with 7970, cause you said it might get GE...
 
This card is great performance for the price, but the throttling and insane temps keep it from being a truly amazing card. There's no doubt it would be the fastest if it maintained it's 1 GHz speed.

Chris hit the nail on the head--something those eager to purchase one should heed--third party coolers and waterblocks will make this card so much better, and so much more valuable (reliable Titan+ performance @ $550). Putting GPUs on water has been shown in many cases to drop them down 20-30c, which is grand, and will make Crossfire really shine. Sometimes waiting a little bit can be worth it!
 


The temperatures are bad all around, particularly when you factor in that these are reviewer test systems, many on an open bench. End users almost ways see higher temps than reviewers. Add in that AMD has a recent history of shipping cherry-picked GPUs that run cooler than retail samples (check Tom's 7990 Red Wedding article). So overall these review temps are generally best case scenarios.

But the real problem, and why the GTX 580/480 analogy doesn't hold, is that neither of those cards displayed any heat related throttling under normal gaming conditions. And as opposed to the 680/780/Titan that never throttle below their standard 3D load speeds, the 290x will throttle well below its standard stock clocks,. Its heat related throttling is taken to a whole other level, with frequencies almost even approaching 2D clock speeds during full on 3D gaming. The impacts on performance haven't been fully investigated as far as I have seen, but this should be a top priority of subsequent reviews.
 


well the 480 didn't throttle at all and as a result it burst into flames, many dying within a month of ownership from heat related damage.

When nvidia fixed that (making it throttle back under extreme temps, and changing the stock fan profile) the 480 was a passable gpu, that only got better when nvidia worked on the cooler. The 580 had most of the issues fixed, so you're right, once nvidia got it straightened out it didn't really have throttling issues.

Of course the original probably should have been throttling.

Meanwhile your claims that the 780 or Titan won't throttle in normal games is flat untrue (btw: do you even own those cards?). In a test bench you're probably right. but i can assure you as someone who works on and troubleshoots computers daily that both nvidia cards (especially with the stock cooler) will throttle in a poorly ventilated case or an un-AC'ed room. I'm not talking about the ones that came from the factory with defective coolers or too much thermal paste (which happens to every gpu out there) i mean those cards will thermal throttle. (the 780 ESPECIALLY, i've only seen a titan 1 time... the 780 is much more common).

Now in the grand scheme of things they throttle from temps at a pretty low rate. Those are excellent cards with solid stock heatsinks. Nothing like the stupid hairdrier put on the 290x (sorry that thing cracks me up). I'm sure MOST 290xs will throttle as a matter of course. but lets not talk about this like nvidia has some magical tech that makes their gpus immune to this phenomenon.
 
There is no way Nvidia can drop the price of the Titan to 290x levels as the card is just a more expensive card. Makes me laugh though with a chip 40 percent bigger and twice as much memory it now struggles against a more compact and economical card. Bloatware comes to mind. Imagine a radeon card with the same chip size it would no doubt have near 10 billion transisters and completely ridicule the Nvidia.
 
There is no way Nvidia can drop the price of the Titan to 290x levels as the card is just a more expensive card. Makes me laugh though with a chip 40 percent bigger and twice as much memory it now struggles against a more compact and economical card. Bloatware comes to mind. Imagine a radeon card with the same chip size it would no doubt have near 10 billion transisters and completely ridicule the Nvidia.
 


AMD has always been more efficient per mm2, of course take the GTX 680 into consideration however the GK104 had no compute. Nvidia has always gone with the big die strategy.

This round is the biggest PWNAGE to date a $549 428mm2 die GPU beats a 550mm2 GPU @ $1K!!
 


Most sites have the 290x ahead of the Titan in most benchmarks. If heat and noise is your cocern Matto, wait for after market solution in November or use a waterblock. Wake up man were talking about $549 vs $1k LOL

Crossfire 290x vs SLI Titan is even more interesting, the scaling on AMD is impressive... Dont forget full DX11.2 support
 



Actually throttling issues with the GK110 variants were the biggest complaints
 


I really can't wait for the price drop. Mind you, my 780 HC does 1325 on water. So 2 of those should be awesome for smooth gaming experience!
 



Hey you going to give up that awesome IPS of your for G-Sync??
 


I might do so but I am saving for a 4K monitor atm:bounce:
 
I was certain it would hit the market at $600 - and it would have been a winner even at that price. But to start life at $550? That's a bit surprising. Better yet, it has lots of headroom too, with the right cooling. A nice aftermarket 290X with an upgraded cooler will yield substantially better results at high resolutions with the limiter pushed up.

So now a lot of people (myself included) are looking forward to the non-X 290, I'm curious where it is going to land in terms of performance and price. I really would like to see it hit the $400-450 mark (again depending on performance) and help fill the gap and further pressure Nvidia on pricing. We'll find out soon!
 
AMD playing catch up, I like this. We need a strong 2nd player in the GPU field. With another GPU company making good products we should see a price war. Team Red or Green we all win.

I predicted the low cost of this card a few weeks ago. I felt like AMD was going to blow us all away with a powerful card ( I didnt think it would be as fast as a titan!) with a low price tag. I dont think they are going to make alot of money on this product. however they will get their name back on the market. That should be well worth the investment.

Another factor that should help the struggling company is the strong hold on xbox,ps, & wii u. With their hardware in all three systems games developers will create games that run a bit better on the AMD architecture.
 
As others have said, this will likely be known as one of the most important graphic card launch in history down the road. And as a guy that tends to favor NV, I don't say this lightly. Just look at the math: $1000 performance for $550. $2000 performance for $1100. It's amazing any way you cut it, and it would compel a lot of people to overlook the dismal acoustics and disappointing "feel" of the product. Plus, the acoustics issue can be addressed with third party vendors.

For me, the acoustics is a deal-breaker, but this is crazy performance for the money.
 
Funny thing, I want to get rid of my two 7870s slammed together in crossfire with no space in between mostly because of high temperatures (the overall experience, while not perfect, was decent). Now I have to wait for models with proper 3rd party coolers. Pleasantly surprised with the price though.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS