Ram choices for DDR3-2133

Andrew Buck

Honorable
(WARNING: LONG. I have included options if you want to skim through what has been going on at the bottom of the thread. Specs are there too as well as being in my signature.) I have been on TomsHardware a lot helping people bring their systems back into working condition, and I did realize myself that I have a bad RAM setup. Despite upgrading my CPU many times because I thought I was bottlenecked by it, then I got suspicious after my FX-8320 was bottlenecking (or so I thought) my single R9 270X. I decided to get another because I could afford it at the time, and I was extremely satisfied with results considering my framerates went up a good bit. Then I realized that those same BF4 maps (Siege of Shanghai, Flood Zone, every other stock map, etc) ran at the SAME fps. I looked and saw my GPU usage was cut exactly in half. Now at this point I thought it was my CPU and for whatever reason, it didn't like my GPUs and wasn't strong enough (probably was good for one, maybe not the best for 2 GPUs). I always knew Intel was so awesome and have an Intel chip in my Mac, great performance for only dual core with hyperthreading (Core i5-3210M). I knew the 4770K was so great and always had a craving for buying it. I thought for then my 8320 was fine, but I finally got the chance to upgrade to a 4770K. At this point I could have waited for the 4790K, but I thought, hey, the 4790K doesn't have the motherboard bundle at MicroCenter, while the 4770K does, so why not save $60? I installed it, and everything worked extremely well - except for those Battlefield 4 maps. My usage was better, as was my FPS, maybe 5-10 fps better, finally hitting 60 in those maps (I should be in the 100s with this setup) on Ultra. I still did drop down to 50 fps (unbearable to me), but like my 8320, my CPU usage was in the 60s-70s for each core (more like 70s-80s, sometimes 90 with the 8320), so it wasn't a CPU bottleneck. I also use PassMark and 3DMark/3DMark11 for my benchmarks, and noticed that in PassMark, my Prime Number Calculations (also happened with 8320, about the same amount, too) were very low. My physics was even lower (Didn't happen with my 8320). In 3DMark11, my 8320's physics score was always a tiny bit low, but I didn't really think much of it. My 4770K was low there too and I started to get suspicious. I remembered that my physics score on my 8320 was around the same, too. I had an unsuccessful thread here (people stopped responding), and because I am ambitious and do not stop until I fix something, I did what I would do if I helped people on here - I tried overclocking my CPU. Physics scores got higher, as I expected from my CPU, but they were still pretty low. I am talking 9600 physics score in 3DMark FireStrike at 4.6 GHz (1.45 volts, that is another story.). I should have been getting at least 11000, maybe 12000 with that setup. That got my thinking. I noticed that others with Windows 8.1 had lower physics scores, and that is what I heard was the problem, but then I also found Windows 8.1 users with great scores. I messed with some RAM settings because I had nothing else to do with the CPU, and I wanted to see what I could do. I bumped up the frequency to 1866 MHz, and tested. I noticed my scores got a little bit better. That was also the first time I was ever ABLE to overclock my RAM, because it was never really stable with my AMD systems (another point for Intel) and that got me excited. Now, I have single channel RAM, and that made me wonder. I tried going to 2000 MHz and moved the Voltage up to 1.65 (I saw RAM around there with that voltage) and things got better. I moved up to 2133 MHz at the same voltage, and things were almost normal, with Prime Number Scores sometimes up to 31.5 (I think it is millions of operations per second), with the 3770K reference being at around 33. I usually got around 23 at stock to 28.5 at 4.2 GHz (pretty much my max stable, because Windows acts retarded and gives me WHEA_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR when I hit 4.4. I am stable at 4.3 @ 1.275, but when I go to 4.4, I can't boot. Not sure of the voltage required there. Just to BOOT into the OS and not get the BlueScreen, I need 1.4 Volts at 4.5 GHz, 1.45 to 1.46 for 4.6 GHz, but hey, it is stable enough to get some benchmarks, and my H105 handles it like a champ, never touching 70 in any of the benchmarks. My physics score was around 400 fps at 1600 MHz and the 3770K is usually around 590 fps. With 2133 MHz, it is around 510-535, depending on what kind of day I am having. Now, I have not tested the RAM for stability, but it is pretty damn stable. It handles multiple (5+) hour gaming sessions without a freeze. When I overclocked to 2400 MHz, I booted, but about 15 seconds into the benchmark, my system blanked out and restarted. That is when I knew 2133 was my limit. I know that one DDR3 interface gives me a set ability to relay numbers and equations to my RAM, with 1 stick running at 2133 MHz (CL11 I think my system set it to), it could only handle about 2,133,000 data transfers per second. Common sense (I am not a RAM expert, only know a lot about video cards, CPU, motherboards, troubleshooting, and how RAM works in terms of Frequency and the CAS timings, don't even ask about the others. Most of my logic for fixing issues is common sense) tells me that with 2 2133 MHz RAM sticks and 2 slots, the CPU could transfer information twice as fast (4,266,000 times per second). Now, this is probably correct in a way, but I am thinking my RAM is bottlenecking my CPU. Now, at 2133 MHz, those maps in question let me touch 75 regularly only dropping a little bit below 60 (maybe 57 or 55 at worst, still stuttery and laggy as hell for me), but I am wondering about my other scores. Now I haven't really been organized to compare the 2 RAM differences in 3DMark, but the PassMark differences should explain it pretty well. I have seen that dual channel increases performance by 10-15% for most, but I think with my setup, it will seriously increase over 1600 MHz RAM. I got looking for RAM, looking for the HIGHEST performing for a reasonable price, and found 3 options. I can either get the http://pcpartpicker.com/part/corsair-memory-cmy8gx3m2a2133c11r RAM, which is at 1.5 Volts CL11, which I figured I could overclock to CL9 with a voltage increase to 1.65 V. Now, my second option is the http://pcpartpicker.com/part/corsair-memory-cmy8gx3m2b2133c9r RAM which is the exact same, but at 1.65 V and CL9, which I am aiming for. I just need low timings to make my extra frequency endeavor worth it, but am not guaranteed to hit CL9 with the 1.5 V memory, but I could maybe get lucky and hit CL8 at 1.65. On the other hand, the CL9 memory at 1.65 Volts is probably pretty much the limit. The first option that I had was the http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231554 because I looked at a PassMark rating with that RAM and it got over 4000 points, while most other high end RAM got around 3000. It is 1.65 V CL9 2133 MHz RAM, but G.SKILL ARES RAM. I figured that Corsair was pretty much the best you can get when it comes to RAM with their high end Corsair Dominator Platinum. This is Corsair Vengeance Pro RAM. I know that Corsair Vengeance is pretty much Entry-Level RAM, but this is pro. I just need to know which would render (I render a lot, no pun intended) me the most performance. Thank you. I am sorry for the long backstory and other stuff. Please also explain to me what the other RAM timings are. I know CAS Latency, the main number, but what are the others? Thanks in advance, and if you make it this far, I PRAISE you. Now. unfortunately I cannot test anything right now, because I am on vacation and will not be back until the 15th of July. Specs are below and in my signature.

SPECS:

CPU: Intel Core i7-4770K overclocked to 4 GHz at 1.2 Volts
CPU Cooler: Corsair H105 Extreme Cooler
Motherboard: Gigabyte Z97X-SOC Force
RAM: Crucial Ballistix Sport 1600 MHz CL9 RAM overclocked to 2133 MHz CL11/12 (I forget)
GPUs: 2 x MSI Radeon R9 270X Gaming 2G with latest 14.6 Beta Drivers
Hard Drive: Western Digital WD10EZEX 1 TB 7200RPM 64MB Cache
PSU: Corsair CX750 (Goes against my own beliefs, especially not being modular)

Again, thank you for helping me! If you skipped down here: The options:
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/corsair-memory-cmy8gx3m2a2133c11r
http://pcpartpicker.com/part/corsair-memory-cmy8gx3m2b2133c9r
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231554
 
Solution
With Haswell, best I've used have been the Trident X followed by the Snipers (their high performance sticks, same as with their Ripjaws lines of DRAM they have a variety of lines within the Sniper series). Also have used a variety of others or upgraded rigs from others, including Corsair, and maybe a couple each of Mushkin, Patriot and Kingston...

Andrew Buck

Honorable


G.Skill Snipers are not the most high end. I am not deciding immediately, I just need the best that can be offered. My budget is probably $100, but I can increase it if needed. I will gradually be making money, and I can really get anything that is not too crazy. For now, 8 GB is fine. I need literally the best 2133 MHz RAM I can possibly get for under $100, I can maybe go to $130, but $100 for now.
 

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum
Well of those you mentioned the 2133/11 Corsairs are slow with that loose CL, and the other two sets the 2nd Corsair and the Ares models both have little OC headroom, the Snipers have are easily OCable, I've run all three of these sets (wouldn't bother w/ the 2133/11 a good set of 1866/9 will outperform those sticks.....and yes they are better sets of 2133 in fact Corsair has a couple of 2133/8 sets, think $140 and $165 though that's really a waste of money when you can buy 2400 or even 2666/11 sticks for that type money (actually less, the Tri's in 2666/11 are only $140)

http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=100007611%2050008476%20600006069%20600324494&IsNodeId=1&name=DDR3%202666%20%28PC3%2021300%29
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


I know about that. The CL11 was because it is only 1.5 V. If I brought it up to 1.65, I may be able to squeeze out CL8, but probably not. That is why that was included. I know that there are CL8 sets, but those are probably out of my budget. I probably can't spend the price of 16 GB for 8 GB of RAM. I would get CL10 2400 MHz RAM, but that is probably out of my budget. I know that Corsair and G.Skill are the best (1. Corsair 2. G.Skill 3. Kingston?) and want a good selection. I have had it with getting just "meh" parts. I need high end.
 

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum
With Haswell, best I've used have been the Trident X followed by the Snipers (their high performance sticks, same as with their Ripjaws lines of DRAM they have a variety of lines within the Sniper series). Also have used a variety of others or upgraded rigs from others, including Corsair, and maybe a couple each of Mushkin, Patriot and Kingston...
 
Solution

Andrew Buck

Honorable


Actually, I was just going to put Trident X out on the table.
Look at this:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231638&nm_mc=AFC-C8Junction&cm_mmc=AFC-C8Junction-_-na-_-na-_-na&cm_sp=&AID=10446076&PID=3938566&SID=
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820231591

Damn... It's like... Nerd Candy
Now which would be more delicious? ;)
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


Ah. Would that be the best? Should I get the 2400 MHz CL9 or the 2666 CL10? Which would probably be better? So far, I cannot find any results for the CL9 2400 MHz, only CL10, but so far, it looks like the 2666 CRUSHES CL10 2400.
Edit: Can't seem to find the CL10 2666, they exist apparently but they are not in PCPartPicker or on a Google Search. Only sold on eBay. I see them in reviews, but not for sale.
 
if you're gaming it's really not going to make a difference. even running apps that use lots of ram won't matter too much. it would be quantity over aesthetics. saying "I paid this much for" or "look how pretty the heat sink looks" .......... and that makes my machine run better than Godzzzzzzzzz................ maybe of you want something to "split atoms"..... run benchmarks and get the biggest score............???????

all this doesn't make sense. most ram, even the "cheap" stuff is really, really good nowadays.
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


This isn't only gaming. Notice how I have a 4770K, not a 4670K. I have built this for rendering and compressing. I need very highly capable RAM that has very good Read/Write speeds, and these seem like the best for the money.
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


Oh, trust me. After I have seen the Video Editing and Rendering performance of the Tridents, I have indeed raised my price tag to probably $140-$150.
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


Yeah ;) I love any extra performance I can get. Especially because it is free! So, Trident X 2400 CL9 or Trident X 2600 CL10?
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


All of these do... Don't know how you managed to jack up prices with the Tridents... Nevermind. Those are 16 GB. I only need and have enough money for 8, because I want to get the best 8 GB now instead of meh 16 GB so I can upgrade with more later.
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


I don't really need 16 GB, and that 2400 is CL10, which is the worse than 2666 CL10. I have Haswell so that I can get good high frequency RAM.
 
maybe on paper. not going to be lots of difference. that's something you're going to have to get in your mind. this is what you said above............."Video Editing and Rendering"............... bud, normally I would suggest 32............... so don't say I don't need 16. 8 won't cut it when you start piling stuff on................... how many SSD's are you running and what are they?
 

Andrew Buck

Honorable


That is what I am getting at - I will be getting a Single Samsung 840 Pro 512GB soon, so I need to save money for that.
 

Tradesman1

Legenda in Aeternum
Statements sort of counter each other - 'pets' and 'not worth it', don't quite understand, though in 8GB sticks the 2x8GB 2400/10 are great sets (and in that set can often, not always, but often) be tightened down to CL9, though 10 is about the tightest you'll see
 
I work with a lot of textures/do some 3d work/do a lot of compiling/other stuff................. I buy and use 1333 gskill value ram................... will the fast expensive stuff save me some time........... yes and no. is it worth the expense.................... beauty is in the eye of the beholder.

you want that 512 SSD.............. time to think about the super priced ram/or that over priced motherboard/or a processor you don't need and manage with something a little less expensive and still do a helluva job.

the ram............ buy 16gigs. somewhere along the lines you'll need it if you're serious about what you do.