Hello, To All
I am new overclocking. That being said. I have a Sabertooth 990fx with a Amd 1090t. I am using a Noctua NH D-14 Cooler. I am running Kingston Hyper X DDR3 1600. Due to IMC of the 1090t , I am only running ram at 1333 Mhz. This is my question , I have had this system overclocked stable at 4.1 Ghz ( 24 hours Prime 95 - Blend ) No crashes. Temps were at , cpu 61c and the cores at 52c max. under full load. I dropped back to 3.8Ghz , My temps dropped to cpu at 52c and cores at 45c under full load with again Prime 95 Blend for 24 hours stable. I am not a gamer or do any type video encoding. I was basically just trying to lean how to overclock. I can not tell any type of real difference between 3.8 to 4.0 Ghz. For those out there who overclock all the time , Is there any real benefit for running cpu at close to max except for benching scores or bragging rights.
Thank You
jshake
I am new overclocking. That being said. I have a Sabertooth 990fx with a Amd 1090t. I am using a Noctua NH D-14 Cooler. I am running Kingston Hyper X DDR3 1600. Due to IMC of the 1090t , I am only running ram at 1333 Mhz. This is my question , I have had this system overclocked stable at 4.1 Ghz ( 24 hours Prime 95 - Blend ) No crashes. Temps were at , cpu 61c and the cores at 52c max. under full load. I dropped back to 3.8Ghz , My temps dropped to cpu at 52c and cores at 45c under full load with again Prime 95 Blend for 24 hours stable. I am not a gamer or do any type video encoding. I was basically just trying to lean how to overclock. I can not tell any type of real difference between 3.8 to 4.0 Ghz. For those out there who overclock all the time , Is there any real benefit for running cpu at close to max except for benching scores or bragging rights.
Thank You
jshake