Really???????? WHY INTEL, WHY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.


You still forget that that was also on 90nm process compared to 32nm process, which is almost 1/3rd of the process size.

I bet if they took that same CPU and shrunk it down to 32nm it would have a TDP of 38w, or about 1/3rd of its original TDP.
 


actually going from the pentium 4 90nm transistors to 32nm should see far greater temp reduction. transistor size is squared so 90nm is actually 90nm x 90nm, just by going to 65nm you half the transistor size. This should half the power consumption at the same performance. So by going to 45nm you'd be at about 38w since its a 4th of 90nm size.
 

netburst has potentiol (misspelled), 22nm and a few fixes would be great but sb might still be better
 


You mean they stuck it under one of the legs to keep the machine level? 😀