justiceguy: That's where Intel actually fails though... How many Atom CPUs it take to equal one Core i7 or Phenom II in performance? Like 16 or so? It's already huge at 16 cores, they can't really squeeze more than 32 cores into one Larrabee, so performance is going to suck no matter what, so their performance claims seem to be outright lies, since 2Tflops(supposedly) divided by 32cores at 2.0ghz(the specs Intel hinted at) equals ~63gflops per core, or about 20x the performance of Atom at a dismal 3gflops at 1.6ghz, whereas Core i7 is about 70gflops at 3.2ghz. Are you ready to call bullshit on Intel yet? Feel free to verify everything I just said.
But how many stream processors can AMD/ATI fit on a 48x0? 800, and soon to be 1200 on the 58x0 series. The individual stream processors are much smaller than the Larrabee cores, because they have a much simpler instruction set, and can make due with much less cache. This is the reason that Atom and Larrabee both fail.