Intel 4 will incorporate EUV for up to a 20% performance per watt gain vs. Intel 7.
Report Claims Intel 4 Is On Track For Volume Production In H2 : Read more
Report Claims Intel 4 Is On Track For Volume Production In H2 : Read more
What is H2? 2nd half?
"As we went through the details it became clear this process is targeted at Intel internal use to manufacture compute tiles, it is not a general use foundry process. "
"Intel 3 will offer both I/O fins and high-density cells as well as more EUV use and better transistors and interconnect. Intel 3 is designed to be an easy port from Intel 4. "
These values are consistent with a 4 designation since it slots between N5 and N3 for the leading foundry company TSMC, although it is closer to TSMC N3 than TSMC N5. We also believe Intel 4 will have performance slightly better than TSMC N3.
Oh pls. Intel has been in the game for 40+ years! Oh sorry, Intel has been the Market Leader for 40+ years!!
They screw up for 2 to 3 yrs, and immediately everyone claims Intel doesn't know about fabs and semiconductors!!! Ridiculous.
They're back with ADL. With RPL it's another minor win. But starting with MTL, there's no looking back. Pat knows it well & you might infer it as arrogance. Sorry AMD fanbois.
Intel's issues and delays with new process nodes started with 14nm Broadwell back in 2013. So it's a little more than "2 to 3 yrs".They screw up for 2 to 3 yrs, and immediately everyone claims Intel doesn't know about fabs and semiconductors!!! Ridiculous.
AMD's fab problems started well before that. It was so bad they spun off their fab in 2009. If not for an external company doing their fab work now, they would probably be bankrupt and bought out by now.Intel's issues and delays with new process nodes started with 14nm Broadwell back in 2013. So it's a little more than "2 to 3 yrs".
Time for some history lessons.Intel's issues and delays with new process nodes started with 14nm Broadwell back in 2013. So it's a little more than "2 to 3 yrs".
And yes, Intel had issues with broadwell which was the first iteration of it's 14nm. But AMD was not in the picture that time. Intel's ivy bridge & haswell were the market leaders.Intel's issues and delays with new process nodes started with 14nm Broadwell back in 2013. So it's a little more than "2 to 3 yrs".
Raptor Lake has not been delayed. You can't delay something that never had a launch window in the first place. Alder Lake wasn't delayed either.Let's ignore for the time being Sapphire Rapids is rumoured to be delayed as well as Raptor Lake (minuscule delay though, but enough to be after Zen4).
I'll give you this one as I can't remember what the public facing roadmaps from Intel have said about both of them, but internally, facing OEMs and AIBs, it looks like Intel will miss internal deadlines, or deadlines promised to them.Raptor Lake has not been delayed. You can't delay something that never had a launch window in the first place. Alder Lake wasn't delayed either.
The only thing Intel has said on the record about Raptor Lake's release is 2nd half of 2022 back in February. There has been no indication release will slip into 2023. Stop with the constant anti Intel FUD already.I'll give you this one as I can't remember what the public facing roadmaps from Intel have said about both of them, but internally, facing OEMs and AIBs, it looks like Intel will miss internal deadlines, or deadlines promised to them.
Again, this is just rumours and it may as well just be baloney, but it is something to keep in mind. Intel seems to have a lot of issues executing for whatever reason and while delays in one form or another are usually innevitable, Intel is now facing fierce competition so it's a slightly different scenario than 3 to 10 years ago.
The whale may be too big to kill, but it can definitely starve to death.
EDIT: I've copied at the time when Tom starts talking about Intel's new platform and potential delays according to his sources. As per always, salt required.
View: https://youtu.be/PHZbgaAoFHI?t=650
Regards.
Anti Intel FUD? Care to ellaborate? 😆The only thing Intel has said on the record about Raptor Lake's release is 2nd half of 2022 back in February. There has been no indication release will slip into 2023. Stop with the constant anti Intel FUD already.
Only MLID has claimed Raptor will be late, so far it seems to have an identical schedule to Alder Lake just add a year. Which would mean this Oct Raptor Lake would be revealed and November can purchase the top line k SKUs(13900k/13700k/13600k) with the rest following Q1 2023. It was also MLID who claimed Raptor would be coming earlier, now he is saying it is late... One way to make headlines I guessAnti Intel FUD? Care to ellaborate? 😆
Regards.
That is a completely fair thing to point out, so please allow me to offer a counter argument as well:Only MLID has claimed Raptor will be late, so far it seems to have an identical schedule to Alder Lake just add a year. Which would mean this Oct Raptor Lake would be revealed and November can purchase the top line k SKUs(13900k/13700k/13600k) with the rest following Q1 2023. It was also MLID who claimed Raptor would be coming earlier, now he is saying it is late... One way to make headlines I guess
First I would recommend we keep this comparison to only desktop release dates(exclude out tiger[never came to desktop outside the NUC]) . This is simpler and more relevant, also Intel needs to keep to an annual cadence to keep the OEM's happy. Anything later than a year is thus lateThat is a completely fair thing to point out, so please allow me to offer a counter argument as well:
Coffee Lake (9th Gen): October 5, 2017
Comet Lake (10th Gen): August 21, 2019
Tiger Lake (11th Gen): September 2, 2020
Alder Lake (12th Gen): November 4, 2021
As you can see, Intel has been releasing them as soon as they can (well, obviously) and not with a constant cadence, so while you're right (I'd have to check his previous video leaks for the reasons and double check) the only thing for sure here is H2 of the year per release. I could look further back, but I think this is enough to make my point: just because Alder Lake released in November it means Intel is trying to keep the same cadence, as it is easy to see they're not following one anymore after "Tick Tock" went the way of the dodo.
Speculation, yes. Not true? Not necessarily. I'm sure Intel would love to release before Zen4 is out and have more ground gained towards the XMas period, don't you think?
Regards.
Link us please to a retail AMD board with DDR5 and PCIe 5.0.yes let's all get excited before Intel even delivers anything!
having trouble being optimistic about Intel's ability to deliver anything given their history this past decade. Pat laughably took all the credit for Alder Lake and claimed AMD is in the rearview mirror when he has nothing to do with the design and release of ADL. he comes across as a bombastic opportunist rather than an engineer who lets his work speak for itself.
certainly great fit for the Intel culture though!