REPOST: We're Down to 10 post per day

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:31:06 GMT, jerk-o <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote:

>>Our conversation is cryptic by it's very nature...Further encryption
>>would be a redundancy.
>
>Similar to all you conversations?

I refuse to reply to this blatant troll.

--
byerstheoblivious
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

After going to <http://tinyurl.com/2tnqw>,
Byers ex machina <don't@think.so> said:

>On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:31:06 GMT, jerk-o <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote:
>
>>>Our conversation is cryptic by it's very nature...Further encryption
>>>would be a redundancy.
>>
>>Similar to all you conversations?
>
>I refuse to reply to this blatant troll.

I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll
--
no, i didn't forget the 'F's
http://www.geocities.com/jerk_o2002
http://www.geocities.com/nameless_mod
-My Diablo 2 Mod
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/bunny.php
-My theme song
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:12:21 GMT, jerk-o <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote:

>>I refuse to reply to this blatant troll.
>
>I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll

I blatantly reply to this refused troll.

--
byerstheoblivious
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:dc2dv054cpju3dahbsajo3hkqcfflvt7sh@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:44:13 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
> <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:
>
>>> What is it with you and the manly juices?
>>
>>Well you started it
>
> I most certainly did not.

Did too!
--
Steven Ung
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 08:17:37 +0800, "Steven Ung"
<steven@nodomainname.com> wrote:

>Did too!

This is where I say "Did not!" and you forget what we were talking
about...

--
byerstheoblivious
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:fd2dv0pg0285ufhafr4qcoglvcvslkkvdm@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:34 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
> <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:
>
>>> Not according to Luc's calendar. I guess it would take him about two
>>> days or so.
>>
>>Yes, I have great talents like that.
>
> I see great things in your future...

Yes, master yoda
--
Steven Ung
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Luc The Perverse" <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote in message
news:35olotF4o8ljlU1@individual.net...
> "Steven Ung" <steven@nodomainname.com> wrote in message
> news:35m4nuF4otbapU1@individual.net...
>> >> I am sorry but I have to ask - What are you gonna do with the empty
>> > bottles?
>> > I think you two love birds need to take it to a private chat room
>> Coming from you, I'll bet you wanna do a threesome.
>
>
> Hey look everyone, he really is gh3y

I refuse to reply to this agreement to reply to a blatant troll
--
Steven Ung
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Steven Ung" <steven@nodomainname.com> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it
gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told

>"Luc The Perverse" <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote in message
>news:35olotF4o8ljlU1@individual.net...
>
>> Hey look everyone, he really is gh3y
>
>I refuse to reply to this agreement to reply to a blatant troll

I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to this agreement to reply to a
blatant troll.
--
no, i didn't forget the 'F's
http://www.geocities.com/jerk_o2002
http://www.geocities.com/nameless_mod
-My Diablo 2 Mod
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/bunny.php
-My theme song
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:38:32 +0100, Byers ex machina <don't@think.so>
wrote:
>This is where I say "Did not!" and you forget what we were talking
>about...

What were you talking about again?

--
"No I'm saying that I'm a cow dung." - Stephen "Suupernuubie" Ung
"Eat a bag of hell." - Cyric The Mad
"I'm all for the girl on girl action, but it could put a strain on the marriage" - LTP

ICQ:65589349 MSN:ktwilson86@hotmail.com (BUT DON'T SEND E-MAIL!)
Zealot the Crazy Lui
Grand 16-Star General and overall director of AGSC operations for the Pronoun Army(and webmaster)
http://pronounarmy.homestead.com/ http://home.comcast.net/~ktwilson9999/
re-vamped sig xp Build 2004.6
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:06:12 -0800, Zealot The Crazy Lui
<ktwilson9999@NOSPAM.comcast.net> wrote:

>>This is where I say "Did not!" and you forget what we were talking
>>about...
>
>What were you talking about again?

That's for me to know and you to find out.

--
byerstheoblivious
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

Byers ex machina <don't@think.so> rubs the lotion on it's skin or else it gets
the hose again. It does this whenever it's told

>On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:12:21 GMT, jerk-o <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote:
>
>>>I refuse to reply to this blatant troll.
>>
>>I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll
>
>I blatantly reply to this refused troll.

I refuse to reply to this blatant reply to a refused troll who refused to reply
to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll.
--
no, i didn't forget the 'F's
http://www.geocities.com/jerk_o2002
http://www.geocities.com/nameless_mod
-My Diablo 2 Mod
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/bunny.php
-My theme song
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:35:57 GMT, jerk-o <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote:

>>>>I refuse to reply to this blatant troll.
>>>
>>>I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll
>>
>>I blatantly reply to this refused troll.
>
>I refuse to reply to this blatant reply to a refused troll who refused to reply
>to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll.

But the refusal to reply to the blatant reply to a refused troll who
refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a blatant troll is in fact
a reply, in terms rendering the refusal to reply to the blatant reply
to a refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a
blatant troll a reply, making your refusal to reply to the blatant
reply to a refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply
to a blatant troll as stated by you as "I refuse to reply to this
blatant reply to a refused troll who refused to reply to this refusal
to reply to a blatant troll" a redundancy which I should blatantly
refuse to reply to, but since I realize that I just did, I, refused,
blatantly reply to your refusal to reply to the blatant reply to a
refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a
blatant troll.

--
byerstheoblivious
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:9jciv05pkqs88865b2ns8mdsa543al3iuh@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:35:57 GMT, jerk-o <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote:
>
>>>>>I refuse to reply to this blatant troll.
>>>>
>>>>I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll
>>>
>>>I blatantly reply to this refused troll.
>>
>>I refuse to reply to this blatant reply to a refused troll who refused to
>>reply
>>to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll.
>
> But the refusal to reply to the blatant reply to a refused troll who
> refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a blatant troll is in fact
> a reply, in terms rendering the refusal to reply to the blatant reply
> to a refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a
> blatant troll a reply, making your refusal to reply to the blatant
> reply to a refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply
> to a blatant troll as stated by you as "I refuse to reply to this
> blatant reply to a refused troll who refused to reply to this refusal
> to reply to a blatant troll" a redundancy which I should blatantly
> refuse to reply to, but since I realize that I just did, I, refused,
> blatantly reply to your refusal to reply to the blatant reply to a
> refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a
> blatant troll.

Yes, Captain Obvious
--
Steven Ung
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:si2dv095i3lb14anrbpp5q200qaonpqgr3@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:45:11 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
> <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:
>
> >> Or better yet, more champagne.
> >
> >It's amazing you're alive
>
> Don't give up hope yet.

DIE DIE Die die Herrn wurden etwas Wasser trinken.

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Zealot The Crazy Lui" <ktwilson9999@NOSPAM.comcast.net> wrote in message
news:sr7iv0dbgj2nu187iilcesadpkmk9ma15o@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 20:38:32 +0100, Byers ex machina <don't@think.so>
> wrote:
> >This is where I say "Did not!" and you forget what we were talking
> >about...
>
> What were you talking about again?

Me2

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Steven Ung" <steven@nodomainname.com> wrote in message
news:35qqksF4q0iamU1@individual.net...
> "Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
> news:fd2dv0pg0285ufhafr4qcoglvcvslkkvdm@4ax.com...
> > On Tue, 25 Jan 2005 21:47:34 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
> > <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:
> >
> >>> Not according to Luc's calendar. I guess it would take him about two
> >>> days or so.
> >>
> >>Yes, I have great talents like that.
> >
> > I see great things in your future...
>
> Yes, master yoda

You wouldn't take his side if you knew what he meant by "great"

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Steven Ung" <steven@nodomainname.com> wrote in message
news:35qqmdF4kjjb2U1@individual.net...
> "Luc The Perverse" <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote in message
> news:35olotF4o8ljlU1@individual.net...
> > "Steven Ung" <steven@nodomainname.com> wrote in message
> > news:35m4nuF4otbapU1@individual.net...
> >> >> I am sorry but I have to ask - What are you gonna do with the empty
> >> > bottles?
> >> > I think you two love birds need to take it to a private chat room
> >> Coming from you, I'll bet you wanna do a threesome.
> >
> >
> > Hey look everyone, he really is gh3y
>
> I refuse to reply to this agreement to reply to a blatant troll

I refuse to admit this is a reply of a refusal to this agreement to reply to
a blatant troll.

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"jerk-o" <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote in message
news😱rggv0l8hqg89ajkrj12klfq0lsi4akc4m@4ax.com...
> "Steven Ung" <steven@nodomainname.com> rubs the lotion on it's skin or
else it
> gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told
>
> >"Luc The Perverse" <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote in message
> >news:35olotF4o8ljlU1@individual.net...
> >
> >> Hey look everyone, he really is gh3y
> >
> >I refuse to reply to this agreement to reply to a blatant troll
>
> I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to this agreement to reply to a
> blatant troll.


Oh no Stephie - look what you've done

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:fd2dv0pg0285ufhafr4qcoglvcvslkkvdm@4ax.com...
> >> Not according to Luc's calendar. I guess it would take him about two
> >> days or so.
> >Yes, I have great talents like that.
> I see great things in your future...


Oh noes!!

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:nf2dv0pld5f5ohkq610ipetoo9o5ra7jgf@4ax.com...
> >> This is my private chat room...
> >Then encrypt, cause n00bs are listening . . er . . watching .. . er
reading
> Our conversation is cryptic by it's very nature...Further encryption
> would be a redundancy.

I do not attribute you with enough intelligence to form such an opinion.
Encryptz0r!

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:9jciv05pkqs88865b2ns8mdsa543al3iuh@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:35:57 GMT, jerk-o <jerk-o@yomomma.org> wrote:
>
> >>>>I refuse to reply to this blatant troll.
> >>>
> >>>I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll
> >>
> >>I blatantly reply to this refused troll.
> >
> >I refuse to reply to this blatant reply to a refused troll who refused to
reply
> >to this refusal to reply to a blatant troll.
>
> But the refusal to reply to the blatant reply to a refused troll who
> refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a blatant troll is in fact
> a reply, in terms rendering the refusal to reply to the blatant reply
> to a refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a
> blatant troll a reply, making your refusal to reply to the blatant
> reply to a refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply
> to a blatant troll as stated by you as "I refuse to reply to this
> blatant reply to a refused troll who refused to reply to this refusal
> to reply to a blatant troll" a redundancy which I should blatantly
> refuse to reply to, but since I realize that I just did, I, refused,
> blatantly reply to your refusal to reply to the blatant reply to a
> refused troll who refused to reply to the refusal to reply to a
> blatant troll.

OMFG

-LTP

:)
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:10:32 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
<sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:

>> Our conversation is cryptic by it's very nature...Further encryption
>> would be a redundancy.
>
>I do not attribute you with enough intelligence to form such an opinion.
>Encryptz0r!

Attribute this, crypt boy.

--
byerstheoblivious
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:09:25 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
<sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:

>> I refuse to reply to this refusal to reply to this agreement to reply to a
>> blatant troll.
>
>
>Oh no Stephie - look what you've done

Do I really have to kill this cascade too?

--
byerstheoblivious
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:07:17 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
<sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:
>DIE DIE Die die Herrn wurden etwas Wasser trinken.

Amerika is wunderbar.

--
"No I'm saying that I'm a cow dung." - Stephen "Suupernuubie" Ung
"Eat a bag of hell." - Cyric The Mad
"I'm all for the girl on girl action, but it could put a strain on the marriage" - LTP

ICQ:65589349 MSN:ktwilson86@hotmail.com (BUT DON'T SEND E-MAIL!)
Zealot the Crazy Lui
Grand 16-Star General and overall director of AGSC operations for the Pronoun Army(and webmaster)
http://pronounarmy.homestead.com/ http://home.comcast.net/~ktwilson9999/
re-vamped sig xp Build 2004.6
 
Archived from groups: alt.games.starcraft (More info?)

"Byers ex machina" <don't@think.so> wrote in message
news:cb9001pg9ijj5bem4nkucus9dfpa8ursd3@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 1 Feb 2005 17:10:32 -0700, "Luc The Perverse"
> <sll_NOSPAM_zm@remove.cc.usu.edu> wrote:
>
> >> Our conversation is cryptic by it's very nature...Further encryption
> >> would be a redundancy.
> >
> >I do not attribute you with enough intelligence to form such an opinion.
> >Encryptz0r!
>
> Attribute this, crypt boy.

This message may have lost something in the translation

--
LTP

When the llama speaks you listen. Unfortunately the llama hasn't spoken
yet.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom