Resident Evil 5 PC Specs

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.
[citation][nom]koss64[/nom]I ran the benchmark on a core 2 quad 3.0ghz,8gb ddr800,2gb saphire 4870 ,1tb machine on windows vista x64.I ran with all the bells and whistles(including vsync)at 1440x900(19in lcd) . All scenes except the 2nd ran at 70-80fps.The 2nd scene which has alot of containers and a small backlot(real small) has issues i cant think of why that would chuck down to 40 and as low as 20 fps.Still on looking at the quality of all i saw im pretty sure my little AMD64x25600+,4gb ram, 1gb saphirre 4670 machine will die laughing as it tries to run this beast.I can definatly see where the specs are needed,not sure bout the 2gb though, youll prolly need 3-4.[/citation]

i dont think your AMD would have a problem if you didn't turn AA and Anisotropic all the way up. I have a Triple Core AMD with a 3870 with 4GB running in Win 7 at a res. of 1920 x 1200 and the framerate is above 30fps.
 
[citation][nom]NeoDude007[/nom]I've ran the benchy a few times:E8400 @ 3.8GHzSLI 8800GT overclocked at 680mgz 990memory clockVista x64 with 4GB ramnormal 7200rpm HDDDirectX10 made no FPS difference at all.2560x1600: 39 FPS avg1920x1200: 46 FPS avg1680x1050: 46 FPS avg800x600: 48 FPS avgObviously there is some kinda bottleneck since lowering resolution to the stone age did NOT affect the FPS worth hoot. CPU... maybe. Test were run with motion blur ON and all other crap maxed but no AA or AF.[/citation]

Thats interesting though, that 8400 @ 3.8Ghz should be plenty of power to drive your SLI. It does look like a CPU limitation, hard to believe, possibly it is a game/driver issue?
 
lol
Oblivion was supposed to work on a nvidia 6200 a few years ago...

Tried it and cried

At minimum resolution, the only way i could do something was if i was close to a wall.

As soon as i would look elsewhere, it became to choppy and could not do anything....

Food for though
 
I have an AMD X3 720 with 4th core unlocked and overclocked to 3.2 GHz, so I could say I have a X4 955. With my Radeon 4870 512 MB at 1680x1050 AA 4X everything maxed I averaged 54 fps at the fixed test. Deactivated AA and I got 56 fps. Returned my CPU to 3 cores and 2.8 GHz and I averaged 45 fps. I believe the game is severily CPU bound, and it must ridiculously badly optimized, considering my pc is much more powerfull than and XBOX or a PS3...
 
if you want survival horror go with dead space. it may play like re5 but definitely has the horror and scares your looking for in a survival horror game.
 
My system is as follows:

AMD64 X2 4200+ (socket 939)
4 gigs PC3200 RAM
ATI HD3870 PCIe
Windows 7 Professional 64-bit

1280x960
Anti-aliasing and motion blur off
Graphics settings set to high

The game runs great! Response is great and at one point, the "executioner" and his buddies were coming after me and I didn't feel like the game was choppy. And it looks great!

I'm stoked!
 
Oh, I forgot. My system is rated at 4.9 and the game recommends 4.7 with a minimum requirement of 3.8. I was actually surprised because the pictures I saw seem to state this game would require a hefty rig to run it even at the minimum settings.
 
[citation][nom]megamanx00[/nom]Just ran it, my CPU is definitely the bottleneck.Athlon 64 X2 5000+ @3.24 Brisbane | GIGABYTE GA-MA790X-DS4 | 2GB Mushkin DDR2 800 | Plextor 760A| 2x 3850 512M CF| WD 1TB Black| Fortron Blue Storm II 500WI got 25.1fps both at 1280x720 and 1680x1050 so It looks like my dual 3850s can more than cope. Gonna have to go with that 955 next month once the 965 forces a price drop on it .[/citation]

why? the dual 3850s are your bottleneck.....get one of those $125 geforce 260 or a 275 and watch your fps fly!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.