Reviews using det 50s release

[Cassius105]

http://www.3dgpu.com/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=74&page=0

and

http://www.driverheaven.net/articles/aquamark3/index.htm

if you look at the IQ comparison pages in these 2 reviews you can see its quite blatantly obviouse that the det 50s decrease image quality

im really rather disapointed in Nvidia

 

[speeduk]

Heh you beat me to it.

<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6988331" target="_new"> 3D-2001 </A>
<A HREF="http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=1284380" target="_new"> 3D-03 </A>
<font color=red> 120% overclocker </font color=red> (cheapskate)

 

[ufo_warviper]

Clicky's to above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^

<A HREF="http://www.3dgpu.com/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=74&page=0" target="_new">http://www.3dgpu.com/modules/wfsection/article.php?articleid=74&page=0</A>

and

<A HREF="http://www.driverheaven.net/articles/aquamark3/index.htm" target="_new">http://www.driverheaven.net/articles/aquamark3/index.htm</A>

I haven't checked them out yet myself, I just thought I'd make it more convenient. I'll be back though.




My OS features preemptive multitasking, a fully interactive command line, & support for 640K of RAM!

 

[eden]

After some constant Alt-Tabbing and clicking back and forth, this conclusion comes for the 3DGPU article:

The R9800PRO renders more bright textures, but against the FX5600 Ultra under the 51.75s. there is very little image quality difference, both are nearly accurate in texture sharpness.

And I compared with the 45.33 and found the same quality. There is practically no loss.

--
<A HREF="http://www.lochel.com/THGC/album.html" target="_new"><font color=blue><b>Are you ugly and looking into showing your mug? Then the THGC Album is the right place for you!</b></font color=blue></A>