Question RTX 5060 or RX 9060 XT with Ultra 7 265K processor for video editing ?

[rajatinfo]

RTX 5060 or RX 9060 XT with Ultra 7 265K processor for video editing? I will get 32GB RAM.
I will use DaVinci Resolve for video editing.
Currently using Ryzen 5 3400G with integrated graphics in Filmora app for 1080p video editing. Also trying out DaVinci Resolve. I'm only facing CPU bottleneck. Suggest me.

Note: Strictly NO GAMING

 

[QyInvoLing]

Don't pick 9060 XT

 

[MEMOFLEX]

RTX 5060 or RX 9060 XT with Ultra 7 265K processor for video editing? I will get 32GB RAM.
I will use DaVinci Resolve for video editing.
Currently using Ryzen 5 3400G with integrated graphics in Filmora app for 1080p video editing. Also trying out DaVinci Resolve. I'm only facing CPU bottleneck. Suggest me.

Note: Strictly NO GAMING

From my understanding then DaVinci Resolve does seem to perform better on Nvidia cards due to how it is configured. Vram also plays it part though.

Do you have a strict budget as the 16gb 5060ti might be the optimal choice depending on pricing on where you are

 

[LOGAN54321]

NVIDIA 5060 Ti vs. AMD 9060 XT for Content Creation​

If it was me, i would go with more than 32 GB of RAM...windows, browsers and other stuff "eats" memory "like there's no tomorrow". Considering that for around 150 usd (if you are in the US of A ), can get 64 GB , i think it is better to do that, rather than go with the silly logic - "i will try it, and if it needs, i'll get some more".
"...lower (RAM) speeds usually have minimal impact on processing speed, and having the right amount of RAM is far more important to overall system performance. "

 

[rajatinfo]

NVIDIA 5060 Ti vs. AMD 9060 XT for Content Creation​

If it was me, i would go with more than 32 GB of RAM...windows, browsers and other stuff "eats" memory "like there's no tomorrow". Considering that for around 150 usd (if you are in the US of A ), can get 64 GB , i think it is better to do that, rather than go with the silly logic - "i will try it, and if it needs, i'll get some more".
"...lower (RAM) speeds usually have minimal impact on processing speed, and having the right amount of RAM is far more important to overall system performance. "

32GB is fine for my browsing usage. My browsing never bottle necked with 16GB ddr4 RAM. I'm not from USA. After your comment I checked Crucial Pro 2x32GB DDR5 5600MT/s kit for $161. Gskill Trident Z5 DDR5 2x32GB 6000MT/s CL36 kit for $215.

Corsair Vengeance 2x16GB 6000MHz CL36 $108.21

 

[MEMOFLEX]

32GB is fine for my browsing usage. My browsing never bottle necked with 16GB ddr4 RAM. I'm not from USA. After your comment I checked Crucial Pro 2x32GB DDR5 5600MT/s kit for $161. Gskill Trident Z5 DDR5 2x32GB 6000MT/s CL36 kit for $215.

Corsair Vengeance 2x16GB 6000MHz CL36 $108.21

There is always the possibility of going for 2 x 24GB and finding that middle ground should you possibly want to give yourself a bit of breathing room. Intel cpu's are not as sensitive to memory speeds and timings although I still wouldn't go lower than 5600 - ideally 6000.

Not sure what your market is like though and the price for the corsair vengeance 6000 seems decent