10tacle :
mapesdhs :
Come on tech journalists, dig into this stuff! What's going on here? Is the tech being deliberately held back? Is it legal? (baring in mind btw that such a change means the original stated performance claims must be misleading)
mapesdhs :
Nobody needs to dig into it, Nvidia were crippling the cards.
Yes because it makes perfect sense to purposely hold back a GPU when competition is nipping at one's heels.
It's long been known that both companies crippled OpenGL performance of the drivers for their non-workstation GPUs.
AMD's decision to offer their professional GPU driver for their Vega FE cards was the game-changer, here. That allowed a $1000 AMD card to compete with Nvidia's $5000 Quadro P6000. So, that forced Nvidia's hand in unlocking the OpenGL performance of their Titan Xp driver.
The winner is anyone needing to run these professional applications. They can now use a GPU costing 1/4th or 1/5th of what they previously had to pay, and they now still have a choice of AMD vs. Nvidia.