News Ryzen 7 9800X3D trails Core i9-14900K in leaked PugetBench benchmarks — upcoming Zen 5 3D V-Cache chip shows good performance uplift over Ryzen 9000

[bit_user]

The new latest and greatest unreleased r7 loses to last year's much cheaper i7. Comments

"he is on intels board"
"booho it has less cores"

As if that's an excuse.

Nope. You omitted the main point, which is that the benchmarks quoted both benefit from Quick Sync. I spelled that out very clearly, but you omitted it because it doesn't fit your preferred narrative.

Mischaracterizing others' position is a classic trolling tactic. Please don't troll.

 

[jeremyj_83]

Impartial? Coming from you? That was a joke that went over my head, right?

Impartial means you see things objectively. Therefore them saying "you really sound impartial" is saying that that person is being objective. Ironically their use of language actually slapped themselves in the face.

 

[TheHerald]

Nope. You omitted the main point, which is that the benchmarks quoted both benefit from Quick Sync. I spelled that out very clearly, but you omitted it because it doesn't fit your preferred narrative.

Mischaracterizing others' position is a classic trolling tactic. Please don't troll.

I wasn't talking about you since you mentioned none of those things that I quoted. You need to chill a bit

 

[TheHerald]

Impartial? Coming from you? That was a joke that went over my head, right?

I'm impartial to a fault. Everything is based on data, not on "I feel the next x3d cpus are going to explore because the last ones did".

 

[bit_user]

I'm impartial to a fault. Everything is based on data,

No, you're definitely one of the most partisan posters currently active on here.

You cherry-pick which data you cite and misrepresent its significance. You might fool yourself that way, but anyone who reads very many of your posts quickly catches onto your game.

 

[TheHerald]

No, you're definitely one of the most partisan posters currently active on here.

You cherry-pick which data you cite and misrepresent its significance. You might fool yourself that way, but anyone who reads very many of your posts quickly catches onto your game.

You saying I am doesn't make it so. I'm doing the exact opposite of cherry picking data. I present averages across multiple reviews across multiple workloads and base my opinions on that.

I can throw it back at you and say you are cherry picking, it doesn't lead anywhere. Either be specific about it or drop it.

If you said you are afraid the 3ds are going to explode because the last ones did I'm going to tell you you are a fool, the same way I'm doing with intel. Problem is 99% of the internet is biased against intel so I have to correct these people.

 

[bit_user]

Either be specific about it or drop it.

If you said you are afraid the 3ds are going to explode because the last ones did

See? You did it again! You don't have any data on how many failed. As far as I can tell, it affected only a handful of users, but you misrepresent it to make AMD look bad.

Plus, I've been specific in my critiques of your claims, time and again. Anyone can search for your prior posts to see what I'm talking about.

 

[TheHerald]

See? You did it again! You don't have any data on how many failed. As far as I can tell, it affected only a handful of users, but you misrepresent it to make AMD look bad.

What I'm saying is that I have 0 reason to believe the issue is going to affect the new x3ds on launch and 100% confidence that it won't. So what did I do again?

 

[TheHerald]

Plus, I've been specific in my critiques of your claims, time and again. Anyone can search for your prior posts to see what I'm talking about.

Ok, I'll pull that card too, I've been specific in my critiques of your claims time and again. Anyone can look at your prior posts bla bla.

See,this doesn't lead anywhere