• Happy holidays, folks! Thanks to each and every one of you for being part of the Tom's Hardware community!

Review Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G Review: Renoir Ushers in a New Era for 7nm Desktop APUs

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
"You can find the 3300X for around $120, which makes it impossible to recommend the $309 4750G for gaming with a discrete graphics card. "

"Intel still holds its gaming performance crown, albeit by a small margin when compared to the Ryzen 3000 models, in this price bracket.

In terms of average frame rates across the breadth of our test suite, the Core i7-10700F is 18.18% faster than the 4650G. The delta shrinks to 12% after tuning the Ryzen 7 Pro 4750G, but it's still significantly slower than the 10700.

The less-expensive $263 Core i5-10600K is the go-to chip for gamers chasing the highest frame rates possible on a budget"

WHAT?

You state that the $120 3300x is the proper 3000 compare for the dgpu gaming scenario, & then proceed to compare the inferior perf & more expensive APU, to a $263 Intel.

Even this rigged compare isnt much of a win - in fact its a clear win for amd 3300x at $240 less ( w/ a budget for a $240 dearer GPU)..
The real competitor for the 3300X is the i3-10100. AMD's chip can be a bit difficult to find at it's 'real' price (eg, look at this price gouging: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0876YS2T4). Not impossible, but not at Amazon at least. The same is at least partially true of the 10100, but:

Core i3-10100 for $120: https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16819118138
Ryzen 3 3300X for $120 ON BACKORDER: https://www.adorama.com/amd101159box.html

Would be very interesting to see a head to head of those two chips.
 
The real competitor for the 3300X is the i3-10100. AMD's chip can be a bit difficult to find at it's 'real' price (eg, look at this price gouging: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0876YS2T4). Not impossible, but not at Amazon at least. The same is at least partially true of the 10100, but:

Core i3-10100 for $120: https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16819118138
Ryzen 3 3300X for $120 ON BACKORDER: https://www.adorama.com/amd101159box.html

Would be very interesting to see a head to head of those two chips.


Theres really not much too see, in productivity the Ryzen 3300X wins on every task, even when pairing the core i3 with a z490 board + ddr4 3200 RAM.
In gaming basically the same, margins are not huge but the Ryzen chip wins on almost every game. The only exception been Ghost Recon at 1440p.

Heres the video of the same review:
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAPq9Lthhnc
 
The real competitor for the 3300X is the i3-10100. AMD's chip can be a bit difficult to find at it's 'real' price (eg, look at this price gouging: https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0876YS2T4). Not impossible, but not at Amazon at least. The same is at least partially true of the 10100, but:

Core i3-10100 for $120: https://www.newegg.com/p/N82E16819118138
Ryzen 3 3300X for $120 ON BACKORDER: https://www.adorama.com/amd101159box.html

Would be very interesting to see a head to head of those two chips.

:)
 
So what happened to their promise that they would announce a 4000G for consumers? No mention of the consumer 4000Gs on Thursday that they promised! I've been holding off buying a 3700X since March for my next build as integrated graphics would save me $140 off having to buy a 1050 Ti or better. The 4700G version of this would have been perfect and at $310 would save me $110 off buying a $280 3700X + $140 1050 Ti, plus no additional fan noise and power draw from a discrete GPU!