Currently my monitor is a 32", 80cm away from my eyes, 4K, 60HZ, VA and 4(gtg) ms.
The model 8K QN900D is 85", 160cm away from my eyes (so it's like a 42.5" normal pc monitor, right ?), 8K, 60HZ, Neo QLED and an unknown response time (I check with Samsung - they didn't have an answer. I found: https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/samsung/qn900d-8k-qled?utm_source=chatgpt.com which states "80% Response Time 3.9 ms, 100% Response Time 7.8 ms)")
Going to use with an overclocked RTX 5090.
Uses: Everything.
The most important parameter for me is the resolution (8K).
I understand the the refresh rate won't improve (from 60) and that the response time will decrease.
1) Have I made any mistakes with the calculations ?
2) What other cons are there in this setup ?
The model 8K QN900D is 85", 160cm away from my eyes (so it's like a 42.5" normal pc monitor, right ?), 8K, 60HZ, Neo QLED and an unknown response time (I check with Samsung - they didn't have an answer. I found: https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/samsung/qn900d-8k-qled?utm_source=chatgpt.com which states "80% Response Time 3.9 ms, 100% Response Time 7.8 ms)")
Going to use with an overclocked RTX 5090.
Uses: Everything.
The most important parameter for me is the resolution (8K).
I understand the the refresh rate won't improve (from 60) and that the response time will decrease.
1) Have I made any mistakes with the calculations ?
2) What other cons are there in this setup ?
Facebook
Twitter
Instagram