Samsung 850 Evo And 850 Pro 2TB SSD Review

[Frozen Fractal]

if it was an intel or nvida sdd it would be perfect, but guess what, is just from Samsung, so for toms still not good enough. I sell a loooot of ssds, intel,ocz,kingston, corsair,etc etc, all malfunction EXCEPT Samsung, not a single one has failed in this 4-5 years,and i sell more samsung than others,people trust my jugdment and work, but at toms they just count the brand.

I see where you are coming from. I guess you don't (or haven't yet) understand Tom's way of reviewing. If you think they are biased, well then head over to some other low-rep sites, you'll find yourself a worthy example for your moniker :3.

Reviewers here, or at least Chris, will speak out whatever they (or he) find of the sample, calling the milk "milk" and water "water" - be it from any brand.

And by the way, what made you so offended anyway? Chris didn't say any noticeable con about either sample, whatever is there to say, is just obvious.

 

[juanjostorreshernndez]

if it was an intel or nvida sdd it would be perfect, but guess what, is just from Samsung, so for toms still not good enough. I sell a loooot of ssds, intel,ocz,kingston, corsair,etc etc, all malfunction EXCEPT Samsung, not a single one has failed in this 4-5 years,and i sell more samsung than others,people trust my jugdment and work, but at toms they just count the brand.

Could you be more specific about that malfuntioning SSDs, cause Im curious.

 

[sgtoms]

Typo in the Technical Specifications table: it says MLC for EVO

 

[bmx_nick]

Your article is wrong, you are making the PRO look the same as the EVO and that is incorrect. In your summary you put the PRO and EVO both having "Samsung 3D V-NAND MLC" but this is incorrect.

The PRO has Samsung 3D V-NAND 2-bit MLC
The EVO has Samsung 3D V-NAND 3-bit MLC (TLC)

Big difference man.

Last thing, you say "However, the 2TB 850 EVO masks TLC's weaker performance so well that we actually prefer it" .... You won't be saying this 3 - 5 years after owning the EVO lol.