2Be_or_Not2Be
Distinguished
BestJinjo :
Looking forward to future generations of 3D Vertical Nand on M.2 / M.2 Ultra interface. Too bad SATA 3 is all maxed out and the next generation standards are not yet mainstream for the masses which is holding back SSD performance. As far as this drive goes, it's only slightly faster than MX100 but costs double. I don't think it's worth it. MX100 512GB sounds like a perfect stop-gap until M.2/SATAe drives arrive with 1-1.5TB/sec throughput. Perhaps Samsung will give us 95% of the performance for a fraction of the price in the 850 EVO.
Price/performance are not the only factors to consider here. You have much greater write endurance with the 850 as well as being much better in performance consistency & latency. Those factors alone might convince you to use these in servers instead of some 15k SAS drives. I wouldn't consider the Crucial MX100 for a server, but I would consider the Samsung 850 Pro.