jimmysmitty
Champion
[citation][nom]archange[/nom]I'm puzzled: why not forgo DDR4 completely, just like the GPU makers did and skip right to DDR5 instead?[/citation]
Actually they really didn't. Well not all of them. ATI had a GDDR4 series, the HD2900 series. It was using a 512bit ring bus to achieve the same memory bandwidth as GDDR5.
But since GDDR5 can get the same using a 256bit interface, it greatly lowers power consumption and cost of the card. That's why we didn't see GDDR4 as much.
[citation][nom]nevertell[/nom]No, intel will wait a few generations before it starts using new memory.[/citation]
Actually I remember Intel saying that they will be moving to DDR4 by 2012 which means that Haswell (Ivy Bridge successor) is probably going to use it.
Of course DDR4 will be expensive to start much like DDR/DDR2/DDR3 but I bet that DDR4 prices will fall even faster than DDR3 which fell to near DDR2 prices withing a year.
Actually they really didn't. Well not all of them. ATI had a GDDR4 series, the HD2900 series. It was using a 512bit ring bus to achieve the same memory bandwidth as GDDR5.
But since GDDR5 can get the same using a 256bit interface, it greatly lowers power consumption and cost of the card. That's why we didn't see GDDR4 as much.
[citation][nom]nevertell[/nom]No, intel will wait a few generations before it starts using new memory.[/citation]
Actually I remember Intel saying that they will be moving to DDR4 by 2012 which means that Haswell (Ivy Bridge successor) is probably going to use it.
Of course DDR4 will be expensive to start much like DDR/DDR2/DDR3 but I bet that DDR4 prices will fall even faster than DDR3 which fell to near DDR2 prices withing a year.