Look at any big city and you'll see the real cause behind most of those problems. Massive buildings, lights and power in use 24/7, cars everywhere, etc. Yes, Bitcoin network now accounts for as much power use as Thailand. And yet, all of that power compared to the USA represents about 5% of the total US power usage. I don't see anyone calling for an end to big cities, big buildings, etc. Well, okay, I see a few people that would love for that to happen. Shades of Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six novel (not the games)...
Not so much the cities, that can actually increase energy efficiency. Compact efficient housing vs discrete homes. Public transit vs individual cars.
It is the lifestyle of on demand food, products, and shipping.
Globalization is part of the problem. It is cheaper to ship scrap metal from the US, to China, to be smelted, turned back into finished goods, shipped back, distributed and sold. That is inefficient and wasteful. But it is cheaper, so the corporations will do it to remain competitive.
Green energy production is only half the equation. A major change in how and why goods are manufactured, and where, needs to be considered. Eliminate some of the wealth disparity between the various countries would make a good start to encourage local production.
Also, all our big container ships should totally be nuclear powered, add a little government oversight, maybe Navy personnel. Silly to have those monsters burning oil and gas. Small scale nuclear reactors are good idea too, just no one wants the risks. Building I work in has a 1MW solar installation, it accounts for about 1/8 the power we use, everything else is coal and NG.