Second Take: Halo 3 vs. Crysis

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Which Title Will Be a Bigger Hit?

  • Halo 3

    Votes: 26 44.8%
  • Cysis

    Votes: 31 53.4%
  • Neither. I''m too busy playing WoW

    Votes: 1 1.7%

  • Total voters
    58
WICKO wrote:
Ben, question for ya: Why are you always asking the questions? It seems more like an interview than a discussion, lets hear your opinion too!


I agree. What does Ben have to say? Is it intdended to be like an interview?

Well, obviously we are still working out the kinks, but I'd say it's more like host/color guy vibe we have been going for. That being said, on some topics, like the Digg revolt, I'll have more to say. But when it comes to gaming, I defer to Rob's far greater expertise. Plus, then he gets to take all the heat on the Forumz!

One other note: It didn' t come through in the piece, but I'm solidly in the Johansson camp (Rob and I have debated this one heavily). Not that I dislike Alba, she may even be better looking than Johansson. But Scarlett seems like she's got a bit more brainpower working, so I think she'll go farther in the long run.
 
But Scarlett seems like she's got a bit more brainpower working, so I think she'll go farther in the long run.

Ben, you're insane. Brainpower?!?!?!?! What what what!?!?!?!?!?!?! What does that have to do with anything? Brainpower has no bearing on who is better looking or who will have the better year. Jessica has got Silver Surfer coming up, and Scarlett has The Nanny Diaries. Who do you think is going to have the bigger hit?

Look, no disrespect to Scarlett, she's okay. But I just don't get the obsession wit her. As I've stated before, I think her acting ability is average and her deep voice is a little too mannish for me.

As for Alba, have you see "Honey" or "Into the Blue"? Now that's acting talent!
 
Heres how you settle who's going to have the better year:

Which one will show off more skin?

Whomever does will gain the most publicity and be the most talked about.

Now if you're talking about awards and nominations or movie qualty, sorry but Jessica won't get much love from Fantastic Four, Scarlett has a better chance playing a more serious, dramatic role. I like brunettes better anyways.
 
Whoever shows more skin will win this one. So if she is caught showering in the nanny diaries...

Also, there are 3 blondes dumb enough to not notice that they are sleeping with a gross 80 year old...

So there you go scarlet, you are not a big a klutz as you think...
 
Both are highly anticepated but I would say Crysis will a big hit. It won't, maybe it won't sell as much as Halo 3 since you're gonna need Vista and DX10 graphics card and not to mention a decent rig to run Crysis smooth enough to be playable.

Right now it's cheaper for me to go with Halo 3 since I have played the first two title and I have an Xbox 360. Crysis on the other maybe I'll get it by the end of this or next whenever I get my upgrades.
 
I was never a fan of Halo.. I could never get myself satisfied with the controller and the movement.. I was born with some sort of malfunction when it came to consoles.. but give me a mouse and a keyboard and i'll rip some heads off. Halo 3 will sell no matter what. I saw a video of it looks nice.. But nothing compared to crysis. Overall both games will be killer for FPS fans no matter whether you hate one or the other or you just love them both. Though this has nothing to do with either games a great big talk of talks is now going to be turned to StarCraft 2... Its about damn time!!! can't wait! :twisted:
 
Lol do they actually do that (cuss in high-pitched prepubescent voices)? That's console players for u: budget power users. I wonder if anyone will actually buy an Xbox just to play Halo 3 (in the same way as someone will buy a new video card to play a new game).
 
I will be buying one around september, but not really for halo 3, more for gears of war, lost planet, stranglehold, possibly bioshock, bu ti might not get bioshock for 360, if i have a kick ass PC to play it on. I'm buying an 8800 GTX mostly for crysis 😉
 
I bought a whole new pc for Half Life 2, and a console is way less than a pc, so i would say that lots of people would wait for Halo 3 to buy an Xbox. Something i find funny is the fact that Microsoft was going to release halo 3 on the day that the ps3 came out.. HAHA, The japs beat them this time..

Oh and if you think that Starcraft will arrive any time soon i doubt it, cause remember the wait from warcraft 2 to starcraft, and remember the wait for diablo 2?

Blizzard is good at putting out good vapourware. although WOW has given them a nice budget to work with... and the screens look pretty polished. But once again being blizzard, everything has to be short and fat, i swear the guy who does the modeling is an overweight dwarf.
 
Wow, I totally agree with the guy in the video. he almost literally was saying what I was thinking. Like when he said "epic propartions" and stuff like that. But anyway, I completely agree with this guy. I also think the Halo series is overrated. I don't see how it is better than other First Person Shooter. But, Halo will obviously be way more popular and sell way more than Crysis. I think Crysis will be great, I'm really excited about it. I think it will be a better game than Halo. But I voted for Halo in this poll because it will obviously (imo) sell a lot more than Crysis.
 
As many other people have said, I think Crysis will be a better game, will "Wow" (starts now?!) more people...

But halo 3 is going to cream it in sales, many people, probably even a majority of people who have an Xbox 360 will get Halo 3, that wont happen for PC's (that can run it)

PS to someone above, Crysis doesnt require DX10 or Vista, it just supports it.

Re: Video getting better!
 
A

PS to someone above, Crysis doesnt require DX10 or Vista, it just supports it.

Indeed. Supports it. From what i heard theres a dramatic increase between useing DX9 and DX10. The game will require DX10 if you want the graphics blazing. If no DX10 and your stuck with DX9, you won't see what you want to see. And i'm sure we've all been down that road before, i have.. And i absolutely hate being stuck with the low to medium quality graphics.. i want max that game out to get its full potential. And i'm sure theres a big difference since DX10 is running a new API. I heard its much easier to make games for it 2. can't wait for crysis, as well as SC2. :lol:
 
You should get better performance from DX 10, cause of the way it draws the simple textures... And as far as i am concerned it REQUIRES Dx10. Unless vista really is as bad as i think it is. vlite will have to get their crap together cause i want to cut my vista's microsoft cancer out.

Hey who do you guys think looks cooler? Master-chief or Special Forces guy?

My vote is with the covenant crusher, even though he was made by microsoft.
 
Well basically the only good thing about windows is the fact that games work on it. And vista is just like all the other widows that had just come out, a hive of nasty bugs, you do anything even remotely complex and you get stung, so what i will do is remove all the features that 'optimize' the operating system's performance 'optimize' is microsoft lingo for 'ruin'. So what you do is cut out all the pre-caching of everything, remove all the unwanted drivers, get rid of the stupid themes, and the languages, keyboards, even fonts, this stops all of them from loading and slowing down your startup and wasting ram. Als you can squish in a lot more onto your install disk. My entire windows installation including, Open office, all drivers and winrar and foxit reader and firefox and flashget and everything needed for work takes up a grand total of 1 gig. Normally Xp alone is 3gig. And it is a butt load faster. You can cut out all the support for crap you dont use, and i basically use NOTHING, this pc is for games, the internet and to be used as a glorified typewriter. Just buy yourself a spindle of cd's and get cutting, get rid of as much as you possibly can, you can't break any hardware if you don't deselect any of the red options(don't touch them) and leave networking alone, except for internet explorer and net meeting.

Oh and you can make your setup unattended so all in all it takes me 1 hour in total to format and have my entire pc back as it was.

Nlite makes windows stable. just don't use any other microsoft products, you can get rid of everything, like security centre which is total crap, and that popup that say that drivers are not trusted and all the crap the makes the otherwise very good windows kernel work like rubbish.

Trust me, you will not go back if you make yourself a good one. i can give you my config files if you want, though they don't have any camera support or anything basically, no phones, nothing, they are for a pc that never uses any rich boy gadgets. You can cut out windows media player too! best thing EVER. oh and you can add service packs, my config won't work for that... So i think it is best you just make your own, it seems a bit daunting at first but you wont believe how fast your pc ACTUALLY is. Read *everything* (except red options, just leave them alone) carefully and don't play around with data execution prevention or you wont be able to use daemon tools... And don't mess with the step where you can recompress the archives to save space on the disk, if you really needed to get that 4 meg extra you could just find a smaller driver file. Like omega versus catalyst.

nLite is awesome.

I still need to wait for a newer version of vLite cause it is not very descriptive of the vista features and i don't want to leave something in that is useless, or cut something out that is not. I don't even use a background, cause every 7 minutes or so windows refreshes, using memory. I only use 50mb memory before drivers, the Razer and ATI ones i have use a quite a bit. If you need that extra little bit of ram what you can do is end the explorer process and then run your game via the task manager's run function.

If you get it right and you don't mind having a spartan looking windows then you won't go back, You can reskin it of course but who cares, the games graphics matter, not the dumb arse menus. The tweaks are useful, they are the last section. USE THEM, you can make your windows something wonderful as opposed to wanton.
 
Would it be wise to just buy the basic Vista or the Ultimate? Just thought i'd ask since were on the subject. Its really hard to go spend $400 for a new OS.. Not looking for an upgrade really.
 
I have the business edition through my school, so it gets rid of some stupid features i wont want (media center or something like that). But this program is definitely handy. I wont be installing until august, as Nvidia decided they wouldnt support Nforce 3 on Vista.

Hang on, theres a program that does this for XP too? called nlite? ahaha sweet, might use it as ill be dual booting XP and vista, or rather tri booting with ubuntu as well.

I guess this program is kinda like using msconfig and services.msc, plus more. sounds awesome, thanks for the tips!
 
I dont like ubuntu, it might be south african (which usually means crappy) like me but that does not make me want to use it, i had one of the first few editions that mark shuttleworth was giving out and they SUCK. I heard that k-buntu is quite good, but like i said, i only use this pc for games....

@Giovanni

If you are using V-lite then i think it is best to save your money, otherwise go for the ultimate. Personally i will get the ultimate and work from there, but it is pretty damn expensive. And honestly i would wait for games to actually come out for DX10 that don't suck, and then still wait for a while for a vista service pack. I am going to avoid vista for as long as i possibly can. I only have an 80gb hdd so i dont think i will be moving any time soon. Eventually all pcs will be able to run vista so just wait till you can't buy anything good for dx9.

I would say september will be good time to do so, cause if you look at all the release dates... Though i think they will wait for christmas to release everything which fck'n sucks, hopefully by then i will have crossfire.
 
Anyone remember seeing this. I don't know at what stage Crytek made this promise but a check at their site forums shows that a single 8800 GTX will be enough to run the game maxed out, how lame is that. I know system performance will always be ahead of the games we play on them but is this a major boner from the makers of this highly expected release.
 
So you're saying it will look too good? Hah, if this game can last years, and get better as new hardware comes out, that would be godly. Nothing wrong with making a game prettier.
 
UUUUM, No.

System performance is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY

Behind graphics technology, that is why you get e tech team in big game developments, to tell the developers to slow the hell down for the hardware.

Farcry is like 4 years old but until last year there were no cards that could run it at 1600*1200 maxed out AA and AF.

Theory will always be ahead of practical application, Look at spirits within. The hardware they had that on must have had a VERY tough time.