Sharp LL-191A vs Samsung 193P lcd monitors!

[jincuteguy]

how does the new Sharp LL_191A lcd monitor or Dell 2001FP with 16ms respone time compare to the new Samsung 193P lcd monitor? I have the 193P so I know it's kinda blurry or trailing in game such as Counter Strike. So for those who has the Sharp LL-191A one, could you plz tell me how's the 16ms response time ? Does it do what it say as 16ms? or seems like 20 - 25ms? thx.

 

[jincuteguy]

Comon anyone?

 

[Nexus]

Come on man, Post in ONE place. It takes time for people to respond.

Anyway, If your going with a 19" LCD you're going to want one with 16ms response time or better. There was a lot of hype with the Dell 2001fp, It didn't quite live up to all of it, but there was only a minimal amount of ghosting on it, really a first for 19" LCDs. The sharp LL-191a is Brand new, you'll have to wait a while for reviews to start to show on that monitor.

Like I said in another post, I'll be recieving the sharp LL-171a soon, I'll review that as soon as I get it. It should give you a general idea of what the 19" version has to offer.

 

[jincuteguy]

what about the 193P one? how's that compare to 2001FP? cause I have the 193P one . I wonder if the 2001FP is better for gaming.

 

[jincuteguy]

Ok, I just got the Sharp LL-191A and it's good for gaming. There was no ghosting, trailing, or blurrying during games. I wonder how's the 2001FP from Dell compare to this one.

 

[SorcererXIII]

How does the 191a look for 2D? Any trailing when you drag windows or play a 2D game (like an emulated nintendo game)?

 

[jincuteguy]

Thre's no ghosting or trailing in 2d either. I tested marvel vs street fighters emulated game and it ran perfectly. Do you have the Dell 2001FP ? i want to see if that's better than this. I know the Dell has 24bit true color and someone said this sharp has 18bit . so i dnt know

 

[SorcererXIII]

No, at work we have the 2000fp, which is 25ms. Although the picture on the 2000fp is kind of blurry, the ghosting was tolerable enough for my needs that I thought a 25ms 1901fp would be ok. However, the 1901fp is only "25ms" if you wink and give an elbow jab as you say it. It was horrible really. I returned it.

According to some stats I found (sharp's website? i forget) the 191a is indeed 18 bit.

 

[jincuteguy]

so the 2001FP has to be better than the 2000fp right? Cause 2001fp has true 24bit color and 16ms response time.?

 

[SorcererXIII]

I would hope so . . . but then again I don't trust published stats farther than I can throw them. It wouldn't be the first time a company came out with an "improved" model that was actually worse than the old one.