Francisco Costa :
First of all, I never suggested the B85 Pro4, but the Z87 Extreme4
Ok, now let's get this straight. We discussed price differences, and you quoted my suggestion of B85 Pro4 and pointed out that the price difference is not that great. You were right with that; The B85M Pro4 is the cheap mainboard, costing another $30 less than the B85 Pro4 with only minimally less functionality. The price difference between a B85 Pro4 and the Z87 Extreme4 that you suggested is a whopping $50. $50 for esoteric functionalities that perhaps one day if an unlikely case comes true he may someday need. $50 to cut from his CPU, accepting crappier performance for a gain that he will not feel now and that he will most likely never ever feel. Does not make sense to me.
Francisco Costa :
Oh, you wouldn't SLI, but you would Xfire...
Personally I would do neither, because IMHO it is always the better deal to sell the old card on Ebay and get a new single-GPU one that offers the desired performance.
Francisco Costa :
Yes, you're right, audio codec is soldered upon the mainboard, and both use Realtek, but the B85M uses the ALC892, and the Z87 uses the 1150, which is better (not by much, but it is).
Question is whether he will ever notice. For starters, all Realtek sound chips have become so good lately that you need really good speakers to be able to tell a difference (unlike older Realtek sound chips which were really poor).
And if he does have the money for good speakers and a good amplifier and wants the good sound, IMHO the sounder decision is a good sound card that he can probably keep for a decade, rather than paying for the sound anew every 3 years (for a gamer, a new mainboard every 3 years is a conservative estimation).
In my life, I have basically owned only 3 sound cards: A Soundblaster 16 (ISA), and Soundblaster Live! Player 1024 (PCI), and now a Soundblaster X-Fi Titanium PCI-E. You do the math how long every of these cards lasted and how long I enjoyed excellent sound from these for a one-time two-digit investment! In fact I could still be using the Live!Player 1024, but I wanted to ditch obsolete PCI for reasons of freakishness (and also because I wanted EAX 5.0). PCI-E is pretty new, and I bet 10 years from now PCs will still have PCI-E slots, even though there will probably be newer slots besides them. A sound card is never a bad investment. But that is only a side aspect. Right now he is not looking for a sound card, he is on a budget, and this is nowhere near being urgent.
Francisco Costa :
Is it really out of this world to have a GPU, a sound card and a wireless adapter at the same time?
If he needed a wireless adapter in his PC in the near future, he would probably already be aware of it. And if as the consequence of surprising events he ends up needing one in the future, he could simply get something like
this. Here in Europe this device costs a one-digit amount of cash!
Francisco Costa :
However, there is other stuff that I didn't mention like SRT (Smart Response Technology).
Intel SRT is pretty much the only feature (besides arguable overclocking) that could be interesting about the higher chipsets (although even that does not require the expensive Z87, for H87 can do it as well). However, giving it a closer look I find that one of the following two possibilities apply to practically all people I know or can imagine:
■ Either one is a computer freak like you and me, so he knows about this feature, along with lots of other stuff. In that case, however, he wants maximum performance, so he is both willing and able to manually install Windows and his most-frequently-used applications to the SSD and the mass data to the HDD. This will outclass any SRT solution performance-wise, and as a side effect, the storage capacity of the SSD is not lost.
■ Or one is a user or gamer type. His knowledge about computers is very limited, even though he may know that he wants a fast machine. Such a guy has a hard time installing Windows on his own. Yes he can boot up the DVD and run the setup dialogue, but has hardly any idea what is technically happening during setup and may also have difficulties locating and installing all the right drivers for his system (unless he resorts to installing all the obsolete drivers from the CD that came with his mainboard, graphics card, and other hardware). Such a guy may succeed in plugging some hardware together, but he will probably be hard pressed properly setting up Intel RST, which requires RAID to be active in BIOS, the RST driver installed, and Windows being installed up front without RST already being active (because you cannot install the RST driver before you have installed Windows for obvious reasons). Then in the RST driver you need to configure everything properly so that the SSD caches the HDD. Do you think such a user will be able to do this? Hell, most likely he will not even know that RST exists!
So for whom should RST-based SSD caching be interesting? I find it a technically-nice feature, but I fail to see the type of user to whom it typically applies. Including the thread creator.
Not to mention that having RST enabled does not allow you to dual-boot any OS for which no RST driver exists, including XP and Linux, because no changes to the HDD may be made without keepign the SSD cache updated.