Aha! Interesting, though here it's pretty straight forward, the higher TDP should be to accommodate for the IGP, but i wonder why TjMax has come down?
[citation][nom]Shin-san[/nom]The HD4600 might be as fast as current consoles[/citation]
doubt it.
[citation][nom]victorintelr[/nom]sucks that besides the 49xx and 48xx series the rest will have HD4000 graphics. should been the other way. In the end the computer with the most expensive processors will probably have dedicated graphics. Not that the graphic chips from Intel are the best in class but the get better little by little. Won't jugde more until I see actual benchmarks.[/citation]
The HD4000 ones are IVB chips, if the desktop processors are an indication, then all Haswell chips get HD4600. BUT, there may be subdivisions within HD4600.
[citation][nom]bystander[/nom]I believe they are trying to get power efficiency down to ARM levels, only on their Atom line. The Atom is what is competing with ARM, for now.[/citation]
Atom is their (eventual) phone only solution, they seem to be driving Core to sub-10 TDPs (recent leak/announcement sub 13w IVB chips, for example), so maybe tablets will get those (surface pro and others already have Core i5s and i even remember reading a celeron based Win8 tablet).
So it's kind of mixed, though the only place they're at par with ARM on the power front is Atom.
[citation][nom]jonjonjon[/nom]i though i read somewhere that certain mobile haswell chips will have a tdp under 10.[/citation]
AnandTech, most probably? At least that's where i read it.
[citation][nom]InvalidError[/nom]The leaked specs are about the performance (QM) and extreme (XM, the mobile equivalent of desktop K-chips - complete with unlocked multipliers) Haswell mobile i7.ULV variants of Haswell i3/5/7 are those that will be in the 7-20W range.[/citation]
+1