Steve Jobs Resigns From Post as Apple's CEO

Page 6 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Status
Not open for further replies.
apple is the american dream, you make it big by bilking stupid people out of their hard earn money by overpricing chic items because people only care about whats in or not. Steve Jobs you are my hero! though i will never own any apple products besides my original iphone because you came out of the gate first, but now i have so many other better choices to choose from.
 
So your saying that you can get a PC-based Air eqiv(hardware and quality) at 666 bucks?
Click to expand...


Yes I am saying that. Also remember that you can't equate an Apple laptop with one running the hardware in more open platform. So the actual value of good hardware nazied into Apple's drm jailing is actually worth less than, say a laptop running Ubuntu or Windows 7. When you buy an Apple laptop you are actually buying lack of connectivity and lack of user battery interchangeability besides the drm infestation of the Apple laptop. So that factors into the worthlessness of the Apple product.

Concerning the comment about lower math scores for Apple users. Studies have been conducted showing that the average Apple user tends to be less rational; something that stands to reason when you measure the specs and cost of an Apple laptop costing a premium to the specs and cost a laptop of much better quality without the Apple logo and its drm jailing.

So yes, I have to say that Apple fans are "probably" intellectually more deficient than the average non-Apple user of the same socio-economic status. So I am tempted to believe that my friend's claim about Apple users scoring on average 30% below his other laptop users in math classes is probably correct. Although, it could be that his Apple users tend to not pay attention or take good notes, but instead just surface the web during lectures.

From looking around in the main reading room of the research library here in New York City where I work, I have noticed that Apple users have a false sense of entitlement that could potentially interfere with their rational assessment. I have also noticed that most Apple users who use the reading room don't visit the library on rainy days.

 
I know why he quit. He was caught red-handed with falsifying pictures that were presented in court of law. It must have been his idea. He doesn't want to take the fall for this, so he appoints the next sucker in line, Tim-the-Cookie-cutter, to take the fall. Sorry Stevie, won't miss you one bit. Hope your sorry behind gets dragged in front of these courts to answer for all this, like Tony Hayward's was to Congress. Be well in your retirement, I wish you good health and long years to think about practicing illegal business in the crowbar hotel that awaits you.
 
[citation][nom]mj4358[/nom]Please be more Specific...... And what other cellphone maker is even doing what you ask? It sounds like you want apple to compete with itself.1. Apples need two book stores? They already have the Kindle App and Zinio Magazine App for the iPad. What more do you want? 2. Are you asking Apple to sell Android OS? If so why should they? What would be the point in doing that? Doing so would make them "just another phone maker with no differentiation from Samsung and HTC. And this this argument of iOS having flaws and being supposedly inferior to Android....Whats your proof ? By what measure did you comet this?3. There is plenty of competition.... And to say that just because the iPhone 3G and 3GS, 4 supposedly had inferior hardware does not make for competition is just asinine for the simple fact that Apples rivals supposedly had superior hardware and still lost market share. I mean whats HP's excuse? Did they have superior hardware? If so why did they fold? And the last statement that you object to 'ifans' using inferior hardware/ software and paying more for it is just stupid. Why do you care? It has no bearing on your life nor has it stifled your choices in anyway. You're just complaining just to complain.[/citation]
1. Apple block many apps that does the similar functionality with the existing ones on App store. For example, as far as I know, there is no e-mail client on Apple App store. Right ? In Android, if you are not happy with Google's e-mail client, you can easily use other's e-mail clients. The same goes for browser (although Apple now allows Opera). Google talk (both voice and video chat) is not allowed too. The only video chat option is iPhone-to-iPhone-WiFi-only Facetime.

It is just like Microsoft makes Thunderbird, Lotus Notes, Evolution etc unable to run on a Windows system. This is unhealthy. Since Thunderbird can render my native script, I am using Thunderbird. Some people are more happy with Evolution. If Microsoft squeeze them and force them to use one and only Outlook, the customers hurt. The same goes with Apple.

2. First of all, multi-tasking. You can't download a program from App store in a background when you switch to web surfing. This kind of functionality is one of the Operating System fundamental. iOS developers choose non-multi-tasking, non-resource-sharing way only because it is just too easy to code.

Secondly, the widgets. You can't see the program's update on the home screen (until iOS4 comes out). You can't see your Facebook friend update etc. This is simply a UI break-through yet Google didn't patent their Widgets (nor did Microsoft when they first appears on Android and Windows Vista. Now, Apple will copy the idea and have it in iOS5 (iPhone5).

Thirdly, the notification. When you are surfing web, your SMS notification appears across your browser. In Android, it just flashes and store on top of the screen. With Apple's iOS, you have to handle the message right away. In Android, you can have 2-3 notifications (e-mails, SMS, facebook update, calendar alarms etc) in the notification bar. Yet, Google didn't patent this unique and useful UI. Apple's iOS5 is going to have this feature too. They copy.

4. Video chat, voice chat by anyone. Google didn't limit anyone to offer this service on Android. For Apple, the only option is to use Facetime (or Fringe but I'm not sure about video). And Facetime only works with WiFi and is iPhone only. For example, when your wife is on a computer (at work) and you are in the city (no WiFi coverage). With Android, you can video chat your wife. With iPhone, the best option is to make a voice call.

They are going to have a conference video call in ice-cream-sandwich.

I'm talking about this kind of features. I'm not asking Apple to sell Android phone. I'm asking Apple to make its iOS better than Android. Currently, from technical viewpoint, Apple's iOS is completely inferior to Android and they are following Android's features from 1-2 years behind.
 
And you asked, "Why do you care ? "

iCare because they are fellow human beings. Some of them are my friends, your friends. Even if they are not my friends, I can't stand still doing nothing when a big company rip off people's money with bad products (technically bad products if you dont' think of the status they think they achieve).

I can't stand still and don't say a word when three big bad guys are raping a 15 years old girl.

I also can't stand still and don't say a word when a big company is taking a huge sum of money from ignorant users by offering inferior products.
 
[citation][nom]law shay[/nom]1. Apple block many apps that does the similar functionality with the existing ones on App store. For example, as far as I know, there is no e-mail client on Apple App store. Right ? In Android, if you are not happy with Google's e-mail client, you can easily use other's e-mail clients. The same goes for browser (although Apple now allows Opera). Google talk (both voice and video chat) is not allowed too. The only video chat option is iPhone-to-iPhone-WiFi-only Facetime.It is just like Microsoft makes Thunderbird, Lotus Notes, Evolution etc unable to run on a Windows system. This is unhealthy. Since Thunderbird can render my native script, I am using Thunderbird. Some people are more happy with Evolution. If Microsoft squeeze them and force them to use one and only Outlook, the customers hurt. The same goes with Apple.2. First of all, multi-tasking. You can't download a program from App store in a background when you switch to web surfing. This kind of functionality is one of the Operating System fundamental. iOS developers choose non-multi-tasking, non-resource-sharing way only because it is just too easy to code.Secondly, the widgets. You can't see the program's update on the home screen (until iOS4 comes out). You can't see your Facebook friend update etc. This is simply a UI break-through yet Google didn't patent their Widgets (nor did Microsoft when they first appears on Android and Windows Vista. Now, Apple will copy the idea and have it in iOS5 (iPhone5).Thirdly, the notification. When you are surfing web, your SMS notification appears across your browser. In Android, it just flashes and store on top of the screen. With Apple's iOS, you have to handle the message right away. In Android, you can have 2-3 notifications (e-mails, SMS, facebook update, calendar alarms etc) in the notification bar. Yet, Google didn't patent this unique and useful UI. Apple's iOS5 is going to have this feature too. They copy.4. Video chat, voice chat by anyone. Google didn't limit anyone to offer this service on Android. For Apple, the only option is to use Facetime (or Fringe but I'm not sure about video). And Facetime only works with WiFi and is iPhone only. For example, when your wife is on a computer (at work) and you are in the city (no WiFi coverage). With Android, you can video chat your wife. With iPhone, the best option is to make a voice call. They are going to have a conference video call in ice-cream-sandwich.I'm talking about this kind of features. I'm not asking Apple to sell Android phone. I'm asking Apple to make its iOS better than Android. Currently, from technical viewpoint, Apple's iOS is completely inferior to Android and they are following Android's features from 1-2 years behind.[/citation]


1. Postbox is on Apples App store as well as Mailplane are two right off the bat. As far as Web browers, you have skyfire, Opera, Lighting browser all on the App store.
2.the iPad does multitask and i have downloaded apps while web surfing! As far as Facebook....I don't know and never had a reason to care. Moreover its a rather trivial thing you mention.
3. You do not have to handle messages right away. you and ignore or view the message. Andriod displaying message notification is hardly an advance feature to speak. At the very least is a convience.

4. FaceTime is an OPEN STANDARD!......http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/07/apple_announces_open_standard_facetime_video_chat_for_iphone_4.html. And if you don't like FaceTime then use Skype which is available on the App store.

And the last paragraph can best be said that Andriod is no more advanced than iOS base on the trivial points you brought up. Not to mention most of the point you mention is based on conjecture and rumor. Also, who are you say by any measure that android is superior to iOS. Opinion is not fact, your only entitled to opinions.
 
[citation][nom]law shay[/nom]And you asked, "Why do you care ? "iCare because they are fellow human beings. Some of them are my friends, your friends. Even if they are not my friends, I can't stand still doing nothing when a big company rip off people's money with bad products (technically bad products if you dont' think of the status they think they achieve).I can't stand still and don't say a word when three big bad guys are raping a 15 years old girl.I also can't stand still and don't say a word when a big company is taking a huge sum of money from ignorant users by offering inferior products.[/citation]

Then you should also care about the Andriod malware infestation of the supposed Superior OS, developer frustration, Lack of consistency across all handset maker. Why is this a problem....well for starters, Google cannot issue updates reliably because there are 3-4 different handset makers/telecoms all adding their flavor with crapware, and proprietary software. Not to mention the different hardware used by the hand-set makers all of which makes it difficult for google to issue reliable updates to the users. And lets not forget that the service providers have to support updates from google.....it not a requirement for them to do so. This is also especially frustrating to App makers who don't wanna have to write 3-4 different versions of an app in order to get a wider customer base. Why do you think Microsoft is making it's new phone OS work on a limited set of hardware for the very reason I just mentioned above.
So clearly your Superior OS has serious implementation flaws that limit the customer, and App developers more than Apples closed garden. Oh, you also have your beloved google buying Motorola.....what do you think they are gonna do with the hardware division? And how do you think Samsung, HTC feel about that?

http://www.mobiledia.com/news/104500.html

You really think Samsung is doing this just for fun? I mean think about ...Samsung pretty much abandoned their OS called BADA for Andriod and now that Google bought Motorola do you really think google will devote the time for Licensers hardware? I doubt they will.....they are gonna mimic Apple and make the Andriod for their hardware for the very reasons mentioned above.

So before you push this pretentious, benevolent "I want Apple to be better" BS make sure the metric you use to compare iOS too has their stuff together and not a bunch of trivial "gee whiz" features that amout to nothing while having major implementation flaws in its support framework just so vapid trolls like yourself can claim some stupid crown of "Superior OS "


 
[citation][nom]mj4358[/nom]1. Postbox is on Apples App store as well as Mailplane are two right off the bat. As far as Web browers, you have skyfire, Opera, Lighting browser all on the App store.2.the iPad does multitask and i have downloaded apps while web surfing! As far as Facebook....I don't know and never had a reason to care. Moreover its a rather trivial thing you mention.3. You do not have to handle messages right away. you and ignore or view the message. Andriod displaying message notification is hardly an advance feature to speak. At the very least is a convience.4. FaceTime is an OPEN STANDARD!......http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/06/07/apple_announces_open_standard_facetime_video_chat_for_iphone_4.html. And if you don't like FaceTime then use Skype which is available on the App store.And the last paragraph can best be said that Andriod is no more advanced than iOS base on the trivial points you brought up. Not to mention most of the point you mention is based on conjecture and rumor. Also, who are you say by any measure that android is superior to iOS. Opinion is not fact, your only entitled to opinions.[/citation]
Here are facts :
1. Postbox and Mailplane are for Mac OS-X, not for iOS. I'm talking about the lack of an equivalent Mail client on iOS. Can you install a generic mail client (not the default one) on iOS ? I'm not talking about accessing your mails from the default mail client. I'm talking about whether you can install another mail client (not a specialized app for GMail, HotMail, Yahoo Mail) ?

In layman terms, is there a single app (apart from the defaut one) that can access e-mails from my GMail, HotMail, YahooMail, my work's exchange mail and my research center's UNIX mail (not 5 different apps) ?

Apple was about to lose a lawsuit to Opera in EU for blocking browsers apps in the past. Then Apple allows to have these skyfire, Opera etc. That's why you have alternate browsers but not alternate mail client.

2. http://www.tuaw.com/2010/11/24/multitasking-on-your-ipad-a-quick-guide/

It is not true multi-tasking in the textbook terms. Not all apps multitask. Some apps are more equal than others !!! Apple makes the choice, not the app developer. Yes, GPS-receivers etc multi-task because the OS gives them a special priveledge to keep running while in suspended state.

That kind of design decision brings unstable and corrupted heap, race conditions, violation of address space, deadlocks and livelocks and many OS pitfalls. This is why not every apps can multi-task, only a selected ones can. If any app can multi-task, then a bad guy would write an app to corrupt the heap and violate the address space of other apps etc -- leading to privacy violation etc.

If you aware of the news about the hacking (and retrieval of user data) by sending an SMS message to earlier iPhone, that is only possible because the OS is poorly designed. Android, too, has some Trojens but Android Trojens are apps that needs user's permission to install (and do bad things). On the other hand, iOS Trojens can be in any form : SMS, e-mail messages and even PDF or movie files because iOS doesn't have a good security mechanism for running apps. When an app (SMS, e-mail or PDF reader) crushes, the whole system follows and user's privacy is at risk.

And hence, Apple has to proof-read (by humans) the app's code before they allow it on the App Store. This is a slow and error-prone process compared to Android where the Operating System automatically warns users of an app's actions before installation. For example, Google+ app took 3 weeks to get approval while a cartoonist's app was rejected and later approved again.

When only a selected ones can multitask, that gives a lot of headache to the app developers (the normal good guys). The app developers can't use many established Software Engineering best practices (which assums an app can multi-task) -- and in turn the resulting software (app) is inferior -- not maintainable, not fast enough, not extendable etc.

That's why I say, "iOS is an Inferior OS".

In layman terms, the environment an app runs has a lot of limitations to the app, which are results of poor OS design decisions.

In the first post, I discuss just the results of the poor OS design choice, I hope this post gives you some answers.

3. I used the wrong words. Read this : http://gear.ign.com/articles/117/1176982p1.html

It is not "message", I mean "notification". That is a third-party article.

4. They plan Facetime to be open. It is not currently open.
 
[citation][nom]mj4358[/nom]Then you should also care about the Andriod malware infestation of the supposed Superior OS, developer frustration, Lack of consistency across all handset maker. Why is this a problem....well for starters, Google cannot issue updates reliably because there are 3-4 different handset makers/telecoms all adding their flavor with crapware, and proprietary software. Not to mention the different hardware used by the hand-set makers all of which makes it difficult for google to issue reliable updates to the users. And lets not forget that the service providers have to support updates from google.....it not a requirement for them to do so. This is also especially frustrating to App makers who don't wanna have to write 3-4 different versions of an app in order to get a wider customer base. Why do you think Microsoft is making it's new phone OS work on a limited set of hardware for the very reason I just mentioned above. So clearly your Superior OS has serious implementation flaws that limit the customer, and App developers more than Apples closed garden. Oh, you also have your beloved google buying Motorola.....what do you think they are gonna do with the hardware division? And how do you think Samsung, HTC feel about that? http://www.mobiledia.com/news/104500.htmlYou really think Samsung is doing this just for fun? I mean think about ...Samsung pretty much abandoned their OS called BADA for Andriod and now that Google bought Motorola do you really think google will devote the time for Licensers hardware? I doubt they will.....they are gonna mimic Apple and make the Andriod for their hardware for the very reasons mentioned above.So before you push this pretentious, benevolent "I want Apple to be better" BS make sure the metric you use to compare iOS too has their stuff together and not a bunch of trivial "gee whiz" features that amout to nothing while having major implementation flaws in its support framework just so vapid trolls like yourself can claim some stupid crown of "Superior OS "[/citation]

I have experience developing Android Apps. From 2.1 onwards, you don't need to write multiple version for different operating systems version. From the very start, you don't need to write multiple versions for different handsets (we call it virtualization technology in computer science sphere).

Regards,
 
[citation][nom]mj4358[/nom]Then you should also care about the Andriod malware infestation of the supposed Superior OS, developer frustration, Lack of consistency across all handset maker. Why is this a problem....well for starters, Google cannot issue updates reliably because there are 3-4 different handset makers/telecoms all adding their flavor with crapware, and proprietary software. Not to mention the different hardware used by the hand-set makers all of which makes it difficult for google to issue reliable updates to the users. And lets not forget that the service providers have to support updates from google.....it not a requirement for them to do so. This is also especially frustrating to App makers who don't wanna have to write 3-4 different versions of an app in order to get a wider customer base. Why do you think Microsoft is making it's new phone OS work on a limited set of hardware for the very reason I just mentioned above. So clearly your Superior OS has serious implementation flaws that limit the customer, and App developers more than Apples closed garden. Oh, you also have your beloved google buying Motorola.....what do you think they are gonna do with the hardware division? And how do you think Samsung, HTC feel about that? http://www.mobiledia.com/news/104500.htmlYou really think Samsung is doing this just for fun? I mean think about ...Samsung pretty much abandoned their OS called BADA for Andriod and now that Google bought Motorola do you really think google will devote the time for Licensers hardware? I doubt they will.....they are gonna mimic Apple and make the Andriod for their hardware for the very reasons mentioned above.So before you push this pretentious, benevolent "I want Apple to be better" BS make sure the metric you use to compare iOS too has their stuff together and not a bunch of trivial "gee whiz" features that amout to nothing while having major implementation flaws in its support framework just so vapid trolls like yourself can claim some stupid crown of "Superior OS "[/citation]
Almost all handsets got at least one update (although late). By the way, G1, Nexus One and Nexus S got OTA updates not long after new OS comes out. G1 (grandpa) can runs 2.3. Nexus One (father) can run 2.3 as well as Nexus S (son) running 2.3.4. For comparison, iOS4 updates doesn't go to iPhone 3G (which is grandpa of iPhone 4).

Different hardware from different makers doesn't come into equation because Android is just a big virtual machine. So you got this fact wrong about different hardware makes matters complex. Only OS version comes into equation, ok ? And for OS fragmentation, from 2.1 onwards, there is almost no fragmentation issues (I know because I have experience in it).
 
[citation][nom]law shay[/nom]Almost all handsets got at least one update (although late). By the way, G1, Nexus One and Nexus S got OTA updates not long after new OS comes out. G1 (grandpa) can runs 2.3. Nexus One (father) can run 2.3 as well as Nexus S (son) running 2.3.4. For comparison, iOS4 updates doesn't go to iPhone 3G (which is grandpa of iPhone 4). Different hardware from different makers doesn't come into equation because Android is just a big virtual machine. So you got this fact wrong about different hardware makes matters complex. Only OS version comes into equation, ok ? And for OS fragmentation, from 2.1 onwards, there is almost no fragmentation issues (I know because I have experience in it).[/citation]


You know your full it right? But you right ahead and keep lying to your self....

http://www.extremetech.com/mobile/93760-how-android-fragmentation-actually-affects-users/2
http://www.zdnet.com/blog/open-source/androids-biggest-worry-fragmentation/8022http://www.businessinsider.com/google-is-battling-android-fragmentation-2011-5
 
[citation][nom]law shay[/nom]Here are facts : 1. Postbox and Mailplane are for Mac OS-X, not for iOS. I'm talking about the lack of an equivalent Mail client on iOS. Can you install a generic mail client (not the default one) on iOS ? I'm not talking about accessing your mails from the default mail client. I'm talking about whether you can install another mail client (not a specialized app for GMail, HotMail, Yahoo Mail) ? In layman terms, is there a single app (apart from the defaut one) that can access e-mails from my GMail, HotMail, YahooMail, my work's exchange mail and my research center's UNIX mail (not 5 different apps) ?Apple was about to lose a lawsuit to Opera in EU for blocking browsers apps in the past. Then Apple allows to have these skyfire, Opera etc. That's why you have alternate browsers but not alternate mail client.2. http://www.tuaw.com/2010/11/24/mul [...] ick-guide/It is not true multi-tasking in the textbook terms. Not all apps multitask. Some apps are more equal than others !!! Apple makes the choice, not the app developer. Yes, GPS-receivers etc multi-task because the OS gives them a special priveledge to keep running while in suspended state. That kind of design decision brings unstable and corrupted heap, race conditions, violation of address space, deadlocks and livelocks and many OS pitfalls. This is why not every apps can multi-task, only a selected ones can. If any app can multi-task, then a bad guy would write an app to corrupt the heap and violate the address space of other apps etc -- leading to privacy violation etc.If you aware of the news about the hacking (and retrieval of user data) by sending an SMS message to earlier iPhone, that is only possible because the OS is poorly designed. Android, too, has some Trojens but Android Trojens are apps that needs user's permission to install (and do bad things). On the other hand, iOS Trojens can be in any form : SMS, e-mail messages and even PDF or movie files because iOS doesn't have a good security mechanism for running apps. When an app (SMS, e-mail or PDF reader) crushes, the whole system follows and user's privacy is at risk.And hence, Apple has to proof-read (by humans) the app's code before they allow it on the App Store. This is a slow and error-prone process compared to Android where the Operating System automatically warns users of an app's actions before installation. For example, Google+ app took 3 weeks to get approval while a cartoonist's app was rejected and later approved again. When only a selected ones can multitask, that gives a lot of headache to the app developers (the normal good guys). The app developers can't use many established Software Engineering best practices (which assums an app can multi-task) -- and in turn the resulting software (app) is inferior -- not maintainable, not fast enough, not extendable etc. That's why I say, "iOS is an Inferior OS".In layman terms, the environment an app runs has a lot of limitations to the app, which are results of poor OS design decisions. In the first post, I discuss just the results of the poor OS design choice, I hope this post gives you some answers.3. I used the wrong words. Read this : http://gear.ign.com/articles/117/1176982p1.htmlIt is not "message", I mean "notification". That is a third-party article. 4. They plan Facetime to be open. It is not currently open.[/citation]


1 Exscuse me I was incorrect...postbox is not on iOS but GW mail is and 375 more.
:http://www.ghostpattern.com/Ghost_Pattern/GW_Mail.html

2. Regardless of how it got iOS Opera is on iOS. And there was never an EU lawsuit to get Opera on iOS

3. If you wanna split hairs over multitasking the go ahead. For all intents and purposes it really not an issue in the bit picture. especially now since companies are using iPads.

All the other point you bring up really don't hold water and like i said....you can chase this silly "Superior OS crown"
but it doesn't negate the fact Andriod is still an unfinished product being sued for using others patented tech.
 
"So you got this fact wrong about different hardware makes matters complex."
So explain why these phones won't be updated since Android is basically a virtual machine.
http://www.gottabemobile.com/2011/05/18/android-2-3-update-list-phones-that-won’t-be-getting-gingerbread/
 
Here's another take on Google schizophrenic purchase of Motorola that better explains the bull in your dreams hand hopes for Google.
http://www.roughlydrafted.com/2011/08/16/googles-acquisition-of-motorola-set-to-doom-android-chrome-os/
 
Ha Ha, you asked for facts and when I gave you the science facts as solid as 2+3 = 5, then you reverted back to opinions : "For all intents and purposes it really not an issue in the bit picture.", "Andriod is still an unfinished product being sued for using others patented tech", "another take on Google schizophrenic purchase of Motorola" ... 😛

Phones are not updated not because Google won't allow but because telcos/makers won't allow. For iOS case, Apple clearly won't upgrade iPhone 3G (grandpa) to iOS4 (an old woman even sued Apple for slower performance of iOS4 on her 3GS). And wait, G1 (Grandpa) got the latest Android 2.3 ^_^.

I'm stopping to talk here regardless of what you continue to say. 😀
 
[citation][nom]law shay[/nom]Ha Ha, you asked for facts and when I gave you the science facts as solid as 2+3 = 5, then you reverted back to opinions : "For all intents and purposes it really not an issue in the bit picture.", "Andriod is still an unfinished product being sued for using others patented tech", "another take on Google schizophrenic purchase of Motorola" ... Phones are not updated not because Google won't allow but because telcos/makers won't allow. For iOS case, Apple clearly won't upgrade iPhone 3G (grandpa) to iOS4 (an old woman even sued Apple for slower performance of iOS4 on her 3GS). And wait, G1 (Grandpa) got the latest Android 2.3 ^_^.I'm stopping to talk here regardless of what you continue to say.[/citation]

You know whats funny is that you still did not prove anything. Just provided more conjecture. There is no Virtual machine on Andriod...period!
"I'm stopping to talk here regardless of what you continue to say."
Good move!!
 
The loss of Jobs (or Apple) would be a major blow to PC development and likely the worse thing that could happen. Without Apple/Jobs as a source of innovation to emulate (and surpass) or competition, the PC would be a far weaker tool - after all, how many column inches have commenters and experts alike contributed over the years lambasting the stultifying, anti-user activities of Microsoft? How much worse would things have been without Jobs? Whatever else he has done, he has compelled M$ (and others) to do better.
 
[citation][nom]15pep31[/nom]The loss of Jobs (or Apple) would be a major blow to PC development and likely the worse thing that could happen. Without Apple/Jobs as a source of innovation to emulate (and surpass) or competition, the PC would be a far weaker tool - after all, how many column inches have commenters and experts alike contributed over the years lambasting the stultifying, anti-user activities of Microsoft? How much worse would things have been without Jobs? Whatever else he has done, he has compelled M$ (and others) to do better.[/citation]

Yep, he is the fart beneath the fire.
 
[citation][nom]del35[/nom]Apple should donate some of the money it swindled from his bumbed-down iFans to a humanitarian cause.[/citation]

What's the point? Like Bill Gates donating all of his money to a charity would reverse trillions of man-hours wasted by Windows errors/crashes/hangups/BSODs?
 
[citation][nom]mj4358[/nom] There is no Virtual machine on Andriod...period![/citation]
Oh, my Buddha !!! (Excuse me for my final comment).
I am a computer scientist and I studied over 7 years on this subject. Android is just a collection of virtual machines (the name's Dalvik).
If you are not technically-strong, don't argue in technical forums because the whole world will see you as a pity whinning boy/girl.
Regards,
 
[citation][nom]law shay[/nom]Oh, my Buddha !!! (Excuse me for my final comment).I am a computer scientist and I studied over 7 years on this subject. Android is just a collection of virtual machines (the name's Dalvik).If you are not technically-strong, don't argue in technical forums because the whole world will see you as a pity whinning boy/girl.Regards,[/citation]

Thought you were done talking?
 
i wish him the best.

i am not an apple fan myself, but i don't think their products suck that bad people claim them to be. anything that is mass produce is bound to have defects once a while. what i actually like about them is if anything messes up, just bring it back to store. i actually think thats freakin amazing. honestly, i think a lot of people are just jealous of apple/ steve jobs success. there are tons of shittier products out there and i don't see people hating on those. at the end of the day, steve jobs is banking billions of dollars and there are people that just sit behind the computer screen hating on apple because they probably have a shitty life and job. if you guys hate apple so much, do something, make a change. if steve jobs could do it, anyone could. hes human just like anyone else.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom