Supposed AMD Radeon HD 8970 XT Photographed

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Status
Not open for further replies.


Who the heck really knows? It is a new architecture it could be better than ~25-35% but I doubt it will be worse than 25% as it would be pointless. We will all have to wait and see. At least its coming this year thanks to Nvidia.
 
If this is how it is going to go, and there isn't much of a increase, I might have to get another HD 7850 and crossfire, and make use of what I already have. If they scale correctly I should get more than HD 7970 performance, even more with overclock :)
 


No its not? That is not even possible if these specs are true...

Radeon-7970-Review,X-5-320009-13.jpg

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/radeon-hd-7970-benchmark-tahiti-gcn,3104-3.html

Since nothing is disabled in the original HD7970 design, there is no possible way to increase ALU's/cores...

 
To me these spec's feel like what was rumored as just the "re-spin" on Tahiti back in the summer of 2012 basically what a Bonaire was to Cape Verde. Now while such revisions provided good perf/watt in a 7790, I think it didn't scale like that in the large chips. And why there's that like a 20% jump shown in the TDP for the 8970. I think AMD shelved Curacao and went for a 20Nm process part. They had time and could then truly compete with a GK100 as the GTX780, Titan they won’t fret over. I think they'll get 3 variants from the 20Nm wafer, while then re-spin the Pitcairn parts on 28Nm which had probably shown acceptable perf/watt. They can squeeze the GTX770 with a 28Nm part that spars and a faster 20Nm (LE) part, while a XT iteration get right up on the 780, but at a much lower price.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.