RedJaron
Splendid
ingtar33 :
I'll tell you what made the biggest difference from a user standpoint this xmas. It wasn't the fx8320 upgrade... oh it was a noticeable improvement, don't get me wrong. Noticeable at stock even... though the fx8320 at stock was slower on a core per core basis then my 965be, it felt faster thanks to the 8 cores... but no. the biggest and most important user experience change was getting the SSD
So i'll go even further and say if getting an AMD fx cpu allows you to get an SSD, then it's a good purchase, as cpus have been bottlenecked by mechanical hard drives for the better part of a decade now... an SSD is basically required, or you won't really be able to tell the difference between the fx cpu, a core i5 cpu or a 5 year old core2duo.
So i'll go even further and say if getting an AMD fx cpu allows you to get an SSD, then it's a good purchase, as cpus have been bottlenecked by mechanical hard drives for the better part of a decade now... an SSD is basically required, or you won't really be able to tell the difference between the fx cpu, a core i5 cpu or a 5 year old core2duo.
So, so true. I don't think I can ever go back from having an SSD after the last 30 months. A CPU might speed a few things up, but an SSD speeds nearly everything up. A lot of gaming die-hards want to say it doesn't help the actual fps so it's better to put the money toward a bigger GPU. My guess is they haven't experienced levels and maps that load in a fraction of the time, OS updates in five minutes rather than 30, and applications that load almost instantly.
As long as the SSD price doesn't require dropping the CPU and/or GPU to sub-par levels, I consider it almost mandatory.