If you compare it to the most extreme example I listed, sure."Theft" of knowledge is a far cry from war.
However, the concept of Intellectual Property was created out of a recognition that certain knowledge needs to be treated like property, in order for market incentives to apply to its creation. Disregarding that means disrupting the fair market system.
So does theft of physical property, but at whose expense?"theft" of knowledge are very different and one kills a bunch of people and the other allows others to prosper better.
Go deep enough in the past and you'll find no nation or tribe is totally innocent. We can't fix the past, but we can try to uphold fairness and justice in the present.Let's also not forget ...
Competition is reality. It's intrinsic to life, even if we'd rather pretend otherwise.I would also like to point out that every nation and major corporation all participate in corporate espionage. This is caused by competition. Competition does not lead to people acting fairly.
Competition breeds strength. The beauty of a fair market system is that competition can be harnessed for the benefit of society, but that requires rules and enforcement. A well-functioning, fair market system breeds innovation and efficiency.
It's the essence of capitalism. People who don't understand that have failed to understand how capitalism works (as well as why, when, and how it can break).You may aspire to have a market system that's fair, but the capitalists do not,
It's not supposed to. It's the job of governments and other regulatory bodies (e.g. WTO) to keep competitive forces in check. Weak governments will get trampled upon and their consumers will not be well-served by capitalism.Competition does not lead to fair play.
Then why do you claim they need to steal IP? Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan developed in the market system. Why can't China?you can drop the crap about me underestimating the Chinese people. I don't.
That's due to military applications of the technology. If it can be guaranteed that it won't be used for military purposes, then the sanctions can be exempted.Considering USA has been doing everything it can to stop China from being able to buy the newest lithography tools while also banning the shipment of the most advanced GPU's to China, how can you claim USA is doing all it can to keep China from technologically developing?
If that were true, you should be able to point to many other developed countries under similar sanctions, but you cannot.USA does this because they do not want a fair market system.
I was talking about it being about 10x as large as Japan.Lastly, China is not 10x the size of USA. It's about 4.5 times larger than USA population