zenmaster
Splendid
KyleSTL :
The Conroe-L processors are still available. Here there are at Newegg for $44, $54, $66:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2+50001157+40000343+1050706981+1051707842&name=LGA+775
darklife, I don't really understand your statement 1 since the Celeron Conroe-L is based on 65nm tech and is on the Core mircroarchitecture and indeed IS a Celeron part (at least by name).
I do agree with you as the small cache (512KB) is a big handicap for the processor.
But, this chip is pretty powerful on a budget. Check out this (very early) review by Xbit:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/conroe-l-preview_3.html#sect1
You will see that it waxes the fastest Netburst Celeron at stock speed (in a lot of the tests) and on the next page at 3.0 Ghz it can match a stock Pentium D 925 (or best in some tests) and in some tests it even beats a stock E4300.
However, with more programming going the route of multiple threads, this chip will be out dated in the near future and simply will not be able to compete. It is a good buy for the rediculously low price, and can be swapped out for a Q6600 in the future.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&N=2+50001157+40000343+1050706981+1051707842&name=LGA+775
darklife, I don't really understand your statement 1 since the Celeron Conroe-L is based on 65nm tech and is on the Core mircroarchitecture and indeed IS a Celeron part (at least by name).
I do agree with you as the small cache (512KB) is a big handicap for the processor.
But, this chip is pretty powerful on a budget. Check out this (very early) review by Xbit:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/conroe-l-preview_3.html#sect1
You will see that it waxes the fastest Netburst Celeron at stock speed (in a lot of the tests) and on the next page at 3.0 Ghz it can match a stock Pentium D 925 (or best in some tests) and in some tests it even beats a stock E4300.
However, with more programming going the route of multiple threads, this chip will be out dated in the near future and simply will not be able to compete. It is a good buy for the rediculously low price, and can be swapped out for a Q6600 in the future.
Those links do nothing but show me how BAD the Conroe-L is.
When fully OC'd it loses almost all of the tests vs the E4300.
The E4300 is a VERY poor performing chip at STOCK speeds due to the very low FSB.
It gets trounced by the E6300 at stock.
If you OC the E6300 and E4300 both to 3.0Ghz+, then there is little difference as the FSB bottleneck is removed. And Remember, the E2160 is now comparing well to the E6850 not the lowly E4300 at stock.
At these performance levels, you are much better off with the AMD solution. The chips are still about $10-$15 higher but they will be offset by board cost.
The E2160 solution provides a performance level as high or perhaps higher than any AMD solution, even OC'd.
So the extra $30 or so makes sense. If you absolutely dont have that $30, go AMD.