Time for Update

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
you dont need a buyer's guide for CPU spit, its P4 2.6C or AMD 2500+ for everyone then P4 3.2C VS AMD 64 3200+ if u want high end, anything else, its either crap or too expensive
I think we need a guide for cpus. Things are getting complex day by day. Currently the confusion creating elements are- P4 based celeron, AXP "Barton" PR, various clock speed for same PR AXP, same PR AXP and A64, Prescott. Things aren't simple for people who just comes here and throws a "which cpu to buy" question.

BTW, I'm not only recommending CPU in that buyers' guide. It's much more detailed. In fact, it can be considered as a model for next big update in graphics card guide. I've finished ~30% writing, hoping to do 100% within 1 day.

----------------
<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86" target="_new">My Website</A></b>

<b><A HREF="http://geocities.com/spitfire_x86/myrig.html" target="_new">My Rig & 3DMark score</A></b>
 
and I (along with Cleeve) made the assertions that the 5900NU/XT/SE
Remember that I was the one who posted the TechReport Review review in here in <A HREF="http://forumz.tomshardware.com/hardware/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&p=381319#381319" target="_new">this thread</A>, because it made sense, genuinely I have felt it deserves it's place. And remember I posted this despite the previous 'misunderstanding' about the buyer's guide.

But let's not forget that as prices come down ALL cards move. Should the R9800 have been in greater and more current production at that price level you'd have a different issue on your hands. I can respect the advanaces with the run-time compiler but I still have my reservations because it needs to be coded for each game. But at least it is a solid working solution.

The thing about the FX5900SE/XT versus the R9600Pro is that they are still fairly wide apart price wise, and the R9600P is still continuing to fall, making it still an attractive solution at the low end of the middle class, and it's strong shader performance cannot be overlook. The only one that is now an orphan in the region is the FX5700U. It was a great design triumph, but with the lowering of the cost of the 5900SE it has be sideswiped by it's own team. I would've thought that would have brought down the FX5700U's price more, but it didn't and now it's in limbo without really a target market. It doesn't have the benifit of not needing a power connector, it doesn't run cool, and the XT does beat it it enough items to make it an arguable ties at best. So you have a much better card than the segement for a handful of dollars more, and a slightly lesser card (in older games, and better in newer games) for a handufl of dollars less. I just wonder how the revnue from that move is going. The R9500Pro was sold at almost a loss in order to put something in that segment against the GF4tis, this seems to be a similar action from nV, I'd love to see what it costs them per unit for the FX5900SE versus an FX5700U.

Like I said in a post to Cleeve a while back before Xmas talking about Anand's middle range list (which I don't think included the XT/SE); There has never been a better time to buy a middle-range card, especially since the perfromance isn't so 'mid-range' anymore.

Just wait til the next cards come out you will see a big shift in the current cards, and then likely another set of pricing strategies and performance charts to deal with. Expect the agp-pciex bridge vs on chip issue to also create interesting pricing dilemas one way or another.

The main thing is to make something workable, but by the same token realise that Spitfire's still got a life and it's going to be updated as it can be. It's still better than that glaring mistake of a VGA Buyer's Guide that's on permanent display in the Graphics Card section of the THG museum.

Now I'm going to post my results of the NEUTRAL drivers. I'd love to do an FX review, but I'm not going to spend my money on this line. :tongue:
Maybe that guy looking to sell his FX5200U could simply send it to me out of goodwill. :evil:


- You need a licence to buy a gun, but they'll sell anyone a stamp <i>(or internet account)</i> ! - <font color=green>RED </font color=green> <font color=red> GREEN</font color=red> GA to SK :evil:
 
The 9600 Pro should be included in the midrange with the 5900s thats sure.
For one reason or another, the XTs just didnt catch my eye at all. I cant even really say why.

The 9600 Pro is one of my favorites I'll admit. If they are priced right (far enough below the 5900s) I think they are kickass.
While I used to be a 9800NP/9800Pro fan as you know, hinesight has shown the 9600 Pro to have been the card with plenty of performance for its lifetime and I suspect it will do well into the DX9 era.
Was the performance of the 9800Pro really necessary for anyone? No, not really. I'm not a AA/AF whore though (I just use it for older games stuck at low res such as Die By The Sword, when even my GF4 has plenty of extra power for it regardless), but I dont think the 9600 was any slouch at that stuff.

It went to show in at least preliminary benchmarks that the shader power that was equal between the 9600 and 9800 made them perform nearly equally in HL2 benches.
I suspect that will remain true.

What I'm saying is that though my picks were trying to stick to what would be my #1 choice for each category, I do think the 9600 Pro should be in the midrange with the 5900.
They are definitely both worth what they cost. I just feel one is a slightly better value than the other, so I didnt include it.
I dont know whether to include 1 card from each companys portfolio in all categorys would be wise or not.
I am personally against that... I say, you put out the best crap and you get the rewards.
We don't do socialism around here.

Midrange has gotten to perform not so-midrange anymore, as you said.

In all honesty, we can thank ATI for actually competing like they wanted to sell something this round. :lol:
Much to the disdain of many of the people who post here though, I'm afraid the future bodes well for NV.

----
Support the NV/AMD/IBM axis of evil.
Who cares about HL2/D3 when we have Call of Duty today!!
 

TRENDING THREADS