Tom's Hardware Member System Gallery

Page 206 - Seeking answers? Join the Tom's Hardware community: where nearly two million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
new computer build, almost finished, - the case LEDs/fans and a few tweaks to go.
lots of software work to learn, and more bios settings to learn, - bios loop if I go over 6000mhz, 4x 16gb ram with xmp can be a bit tricky, also, the 6000mhz is stable and stock cooling. in a few years, prolly buy a few 64gb sticks of ram. (I think you will all find this an interesting build.)(UFO)

CPU: Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
CPU Cooler: Thermaltake ASTRIA 600 120mm ARGB Lighting CPU Cooler
Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX Z890-F GAMING WIFI (iGPU off atm)
Memory: 2 sets Corsair Vengeance RGB CL32 6400MHz DDR5 32GB (2x16GB)(64GB total)
Storage: Samsung SSD 9100 PRO 1TB NVMe (PCIe x4 32.0 GT/s)
Video Card: Intel Arc B580 Limited Edition Battlemage
NPU: Intel Arrow Lake-S/HX NPU - Neural Processing Unit (Movidius VPU3720) [ASUS]
Case: Corsair iCUE 5000X RGB Tempered Glass Mid-Tower ATX PC Smart Case
Power Supply: Corsair CX-M Series™ CX750M
OS: Microsoft Windows 11 Home (x64) Build 26100.4202 (24H2)

https://au.pcpartpicker.com/list/WfsCVF


[td]
Total:


[/td]​
[td]$2818.33 AUD[/td]


 
Last edited:
My pre-tariffs/Paul Revere build.
"The tariffs are coming, the tariffs are coming!"

MSI MAG X870 WiFi
AMD 9900x
32Gigs XPG Lancer DDR5 6400MHz. CL 32
Asus RTX4070 Ti Super OC
Case Corsair 7000D
ASUS Prime 850W Gold 850 Watt, ATX 3.0
CORSAIR 360mm Nautilus 360 RS Liquid Cooler
Samsung 990 Pro 2TB
WD Black SN850x 1TB
Silicon Power US75 2TB Backup internal
Silicon Power US752TB Gen2 speed external case for redundant backups.
One case fan....
View: https://imgur.com/a/aUNOL1n
 
Last edited:
i think i could tweak the ram voltage, and timings, but I'm happy with the 4 RAM running at 6000mhz 32CL, running in Quad mode. the xmp with 4 sticks of ram sort of a old problem, and so many new settings in bios, going to take me awhile to learn them all. last comp I built was in 2012, P9X79, i7 3820 (2011 pin), 4x 4gb 2133mhz quad,
Should of got 2 X 32GB set for a better chance of running a higher speed, no such thing as quad mode on a dual channel board.

Still a nice PC.
 
Should of got 2 X 32GB set for a better chance of running a higher speed, no such thing as quad mode on a dual channel board.
@caution1397 , just in case it wasn't clear, the issue is that you're running in what's sometimes called a 2DPC (2 DIMMs per channel) configuration. The memory controller on modern desktop CPUs is only dual-channel, but by populating all four DIMM slots, it's having to drive 2 DIMMs in each channel. This hampers your ability to achieve higher speeds and tighter timings.

You could confirm this by pulling one DIMM out of each channel and then see what speeds and timings you can achieve. Run a memory benchmark, and you'll see that populating all 4 slots isn't helping you, performance-wise. It's something people only do when they need more memory capacity than they can achieve with just 2 DIMMs.

Maybe you know all that, but the term "quad mode" sort of implies otherwise.
 
  • Like
Reactions: caution1397
interesting, before i played in bios and turned on xmp, the ram was running at stock, 4800MHz in DUAL channel, and when I tweaked the volts, timing settings, it shows Quad channel, - my old p9x79 did quad channel as well. with 4x sticks of 2133mhz ddr4.
https://www.pcworld.com/article/423...e-shocking-truth-about-their-performance.html
do you know how to play a game of "Spot the difference"?
Okay, I see the point of confusion. The explanation gets at how DDR5 works, compared to previous DDR standards. All DDR-class DIMMs have had a 64-bit data width (leaving aside the detail of ECC) and, until DDR5, the entire thing acted like a single channel (i.e. you could only read or write 64 consecutive bits in memory). You basically send the DIMM an address and either send or receive data in 64-bit chunks. DDR5 changed that, by splitting each DIMM into two, independent 32-bit channels. This means each channel has its own address and data bus.

What's happening is that you're switching the way the memory controller interfaces with the DIMMs between treating the pair of 32-bit subchannels as one logical channel (yielding a total of 2 logical memory channels, across the entire CPU), and independent 32-bit channels (yielding a total of 4 memory channels, across the entire CPU).

The total amount of data that can be sent or received per DRAM cycle doesn't change, but by unchaining the subchannels of each 64-bit memory channel potentially allows more memory-level parallelism to be exploited. I did a quick search, but haven't found any benchmarks comparing the two modes. I'd expect no more than a single digit % change.

@thestryker , do you have any more info on this?

my old p9x79 did quad channel as well. with 4x sticks of 2133mhz ddr4.
That's different. It was a true quad-channel CPU/platform, with a true 256-bit data path to memory. Arrow Lake has only a 128-bit memory interface, no matter what motherboard you use it on.

Old article. Refers to DDR4 and 256-bit vs. 128-bit.

Anyway, if you don't believe me, an easy way to confirm is to run a memory benchmark on your machine in dual and quad modes. I'd be interested in seeing what results you get. Furthermore, you could pull two of the DIMMs and it should still allow you to enable "quad mode" and you'll still get comparable results as you got with 4 DIMMs.

BTW, thanks for sharing your screen shots. I didn't know about this detail of Arrow, before now. Rather, I assumed that all DDR5-capable CPUs supported what they're calling "quad mode".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: caution1397
agree, but i'm not trying to overclock it, the ram is "tested to 6400", however these sticks are actually 4800mhz, - it's sort of faulse advertising, and the 4800mhz is already clocking to 6000mhz stable atm,
I can't speak to your priorities, but if I were building an Arrow Lake PC, I'd be trying to use CUDIMMs. Those use a superior technology, which is called a CKD chip. Basically, it provides a cleaner clock signal for the DRAM chips to use, which enables better stability at high speeds.

TechPowerUp has this explainer, as well as a "performance showcase" using DDR5-9600 modules:


They were also able to achieve DDR5-6400 speeds with a quad-DIMM setup, using CUDIMMs:
 
  • Like
Reactions: caution1397
I can't speak to your priorities, but if I were building an Arrow Lake PC, I'd be trying to use CUDIMMs. Those use a superior technology, which is called a CKD chip. Basically, it provides a cleaner clock signal for the DRAM chips to use, which enables better stability at high speeds.

TechPowerUp has this explainer, as well as a "performance showcase" using DDR5-9600 modules:

They were also able to achieve DDR5-6400 speeds with a quad-DIMM setup, using CUDIMMs:
Thank you, good article. 👍👍
(I gotta tell you, this computer blows that old p9x79 away. haha)

i ran a quick test.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bit_user
@thestryker , do you have any more info on this?
The only person I caught talking about it was Roman (der8auer) and he made it sound like this was standard function for the ARL memory controller. This article mentions the memory controller design difference, but just in passing: https://skatterbencher.com/2024/10/24/arrow-lake-memss-overclocking/

As far as I'm aware there aren't different modes for the ARL memory controller with regards to independent channel level access. I believe Asus allows channel level power tweaking which might matter for XOC.

edit: for the on topic my sig system since I hadn't posted it at all 🤣
aP93kyj.jpeg
 
Last edited:
The cooler and case fan are barely audible. I have had loud coolers before. This one is pleasant.
same, omg the new comp is so silent, interesting mention, this intel arc GPU is weird, the fans are always "off", the only time they come on is when the vid card goes over a certain temp, I think it's 50oC, - my old comp was so loud. lol
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: bit_user
same, omg the new comp is so silent, interesting mention, this intel arc GPU is weird, the fans are always "off", the only time they come on is when the vid card goes over a certain temp, I think it's 50oC, - my old comp was so loud. lol
I also have an AM4 x570/5950x with a EVGA RTX3080 ti OC FWxxx. I am not much of a gamer. The three cooling fans stay off 90% of the time. Overkill!
 
  • Like
Reactions: caution1397