[citation][nom]wannabepro[/nom]Frame Rate is kind of slow..That's not a very revolutionary leap either.. It's more evolutionary.We should have 50 MP images by now... (Not that we can actually see images that good)[/citation]
ok, frame rate... even higher end slr cameras only get 6-10 frames at max resolution.
granted its probably not as good as just taking the picture in terms of sharpness, but its progress.
now the next thing is about 50mp... yea... no...
what i want is a full resolution 8mp camera for under 500$, as in it takes a 8mp picture, and i need to adjust nothing to get the best quality. i cant explain it, but look at the cellphone that took a 40 something mp picture, at full size, it looked bad, but shrink it to 8mp, and you are looking at a camera better than almost all point and shoots
i'm more interested in how good of a picture this takes, and how cheap it will be to implement, rather than complaining about the mp size, because really, i don't need more than 8-12mp unless i'm making a poster.
[citation][nom]wolley74[/nom]i just hope they bring back the viewfinder, hate point and shoot with a passion[/citation]
um... yea... get a slr camera than...the view finder was only good because at the time you couldn't see the picture you were taking.
i believe mid range slr camreas still have viewfinders, i know low end ones moved over to an lcd screen, and high end ones are meant to be hooked up to a laptop and driven that way.