[citation][nom]back_by_demand[/nom]Was it in excess by an additional 21 degrees?Don't worry, be happy[/citation]
To get the internal ambient temperature of a room up to 64C, the device that produces heat has to be WELL above that; you don't boil water with a 100-degree flame, you have a flame that burns much hotter, in the hundreds of degrees. So it's quite possible that with that amount of heat buildup, the actual chip temps exceeded 85 degrees.
Of course, with a mobile device, concerns over battery life push down TDP, and hence heat production, so in mobile applications, the thermal tolerance of a flash memory device isn't as critical. It remains so in SSD applications, though.
[citation][nom]back_by_demand[/nom]Well, if I am reading this rightSo assuming that they work in tandem and data is written between all 16 chips the same way RAID does, then can I assume the 21MB / 46MB can be times by 16 to 336MB / 736MB.Obviously it doesn't scale up exactly so how much do I take off for overheads to get the same speeds as top end SSDs?[/citation]
Actually, the speeds given ARE for "RAID-like" usage; that's what the whole use of the word "interleaved" indicates. Write speed is apparently unaffected by this, but read speed is bumped up to 55MB/sec.