Review Tryx Panorama 360 ARGB Review: Cooling newcomer brings F1-level performance

[Admin]

Tryx, a new contender in the cooling market, sets itself apart from the competition through its eye-catching design and strong performance.

Tryx Panorama 360 ARGB Review: Cooling newcomer brings F1-level performance : Read more

 

[das_stig]

When your cpu cooling solution costs as much as your cpu, things are just getting stupid !

 

[thestryker]

Well at that price it seems to mostly serve as a justification to get a Hyte AIO to me. While the screen is certainly clever it's still just a generic Asetek AIO and the minimum noise level seems quite bad.

 

[newtechldtech]

... invest in performance and not in stupid lights and look ....

 

[Heiro78]

On page one under Testing Configuration, you've stated the i7-13700K, but the second page you show you've used the i7-14700K. I believe page one to be the typo.

In the first chart, did you intend to show Maximum CPU Power Consumption as the last bar or was this supposed to represent the Tryx AIO's average watts cooled like the other coolers in the same chart?

 

[thestryker]

In the first chart, did you intend to show Maximum CPU Power Consumption as the last bar or was this supposed to represent the Tryx AIO's average watts cooled like the other coolers in the same chart?

It's a bit confusing, but it's intentional as this cooler is able to cool the 275W this CPU uses at maximum. If they moved the next paragraph and graph above it I think it would be less confusing so you see the temperature performance and explanation first.

 

[Albert.Thomas]

On page one under Testing Configuration, you've stated the i7-13700K, but the second page you show you've used the i7-14700K. I believe page one to be the typo.

In the first chart, did you intend to show Maximum CPU Power Consumption as the last bar or was this supposed to represent the Tryx AIO's average watts cooled like the other coolers in the same chart?

Oh boy, that was a typo. Thanks for pointing that out.

The first chart is where you'll find most coolers land - this chart shows the average power consumption in an unrestricted workload.

The Tryx AIO is not on this list because it was able to keep the CPU under it's maximum temperature, ergo the 2nd chart. I do not expect many coolers to "pass" this test.

Does that explain it better?

 

[craigss]

This whole test is pointless for me, so we have a CPU cooler that keeps its fans at a higher level at all times than most others so its noisier which is the whole reason most folks go AIO or liquid to run quieter so fail number 1
Then at maximum load yes its certainly cooler by a whopping 3Deg C than the Arctic cooler but way louder by the same 3 Decibels which as we know is non linear so 3 points on DB is a lot.
Then we come to price $350! The Arctic ARGB version is $240 less for 3DegC but less noise PFFh how can you as a honest reviewer even think to call this F1 level performance its a rip off its a generic pump cooler with a set of noisy fast fans and a fancy screen, not only that but you then compare it to an air cooler for noise!
Did you bother to run a 2 hour test to really soak the heat into the liquid?
My older custom loop which has a 3090Ti plus a 7900x with 1x480 and 2x360 with a 750ml reservoir can hit peak coolant levels of 38DegC after a very long OCCT test at max everything usually at least an hour, granted this is at least double the cost of the AIO but its a relevant test regardless and the systems effectiveness is in how long it takes to drop back to it nominal 5DegC over ambient

 

[BadBoyGreek]

When your cpu cooling solution costs as much as your cpu, things are just getting stupid !

Facts!

 

[scoob010]

No Gallahad II performance 360 in the comparison?
Just bought a LCD 280. Would have liked to know how the 360s stacked up after the 240 Tryx arrived.