The problem is, we don't live in "I's world".
In "I's world":
- inferior parts are unacceptable and any component short of ideal should be rejected regardless of the cost. Absolutely no acceptable losses and the idea of a component failure is ludicrous.
There is no "I" world, there are specs and the core requirement of those specs is a guarantee of product ability.
- Every PSU of every grade and budget should hold to his standard of having rated to 1/4 of the actual max rating, should the unit be held to a redundant environment and the unit can be "redlined" to 100% of the max rating in continuous use with loss of redundancy.
You would do well to drop the attitude. The ENTIRE PURPOSE of specs is to MEET THEM. It's not an "idea", not a "pleasant suggestion", not a "pipe dream", it is a guarantee.
- The cost of the unit will not increase under these new guidelines, and manufacturers that attempt to pass the costs to the consumer will be kicked and banned from the industry.
None of this matters. It is required to meet it's specifications. Period. If it can't meet the specs they'd "like" to claim, when costing only $10 in parts, there's no "but we really really really wanna claim it", it is absolutely manditory it be spec'd according to it's actual capabilities under all specs combined or it's fraud and someone needs to go to prison.
Funny how you wouldn't accept this if your car manufacturer claimed a certain engine size, or your water heater couldn't deliver on it's rating, but suddenly with PSU you become confused.