[citation][nom]zelannii[/nom]Basic users today are expecting Hulu to work, Netflix, Flash videos, online games, and more. An intel GMA GPU that can't handle 1080p video is gonna piss off a lot of consumers...[/citation]
If the Display isn't HD then this whole remark is pretty much a moot point then isn't it?
[citation][nom]zelannii[/nom]Step up $500, and you get a 3GHz iMac, 21.5 vs 18.5", better resolution, better GPU, Better WiFi, bluetooth, much greater expandability, wireless components (kbd/mouse), better speakers, lower power draw, cheaper extended warranty, a free copy of Parallels 5, and more. A Dell with an intel GMA GPU might last a year or two before it's completely useless on the modern Internet, and from day 1 it can't do HD video and can't support dual displays, where an iMac should last 3-5 years easy, and resell later for 1/3rd its value or more. At least on the Mini or an iMac you can play WoW...[/citation]
Thats asking users to almost double what they paid for this unit already.. for just 500 dollars more.... if you look at it that way, head over to dell.com and look at what you can get there for 500 more... pretty sure something that would blow away your Mac recommendation out of the water in an instant... not always a good idea to bring Mac and Price into a battle... we already know that when you crack open a Mac, most of the components are the same as the competitors with few exceptions... the reason for less problems for Apple is that they have WAY less configuration options for you to choose from and don't have to worry about different parts causing differnt issues. I'm sure if Dell only offered 4 laptops, with no choice in hardware and got the kinks worked out that they would rise to the cream of the crop in reliability as well.. how many year old tech are most of those MAC's based on?? Any using the initial Core i7, or i5?'s Any using the second Gen Core i5's? Say... the MAC's are 2 generations back on processor tech...
Get my long but pointed response...