In an earlier post I asked if a Core 2 Quad @2.66 would boost performance over a Core 2 Due @2.2 and it DID...Well mostly. Games like Skyrim and newer games ran on High setting just fine with over ~40 fps. What it did NOT excel in were CPU intensive games like RIFT, Planetside 2, and TERA. Those are all MMORPGs and use a lot of CPU.
Now I went off on a hunch and ordered the best Core 2 Duo processor @3.33Ghz for ~$25. Will this help my performance on CPU bound games? I heard that most or all of those games utilize no more than 2 cores, and that TERA was optimized for SINGLE core processors... Should I expect a gain going from 2.66Ghz to 3.33Ghz?
Specs:
Core 2 duo E8600 or Core 2 Quad Q8400
EVGA Gt 730 2GB GDDR5 64-bit Low Profile
4 Gigs of RAM (non upgrade-able with MOBO)
I ran Planetside 2 on High setting and the bottleneck was not my GPU but rather my CPU, turning all settings to Low made FPS WORSE. I had no parked cores on the quad.
Rift just got low FPS in general.
Tera had a barely playable 19-30 FPS and characters struggled to render at all, especially in big cities with lots of characters.
I can't overclock.
Now I went off on a hunch and ordered the best Core 2 Duo processor @3.33Ghz for ~$25. Will this help my performance on CPU bound games? I heard that most or all of those games utilize no more than 2 cores, and that TERA was optimized for SINGLE core processors... Should I expect a gain going from 2.66Ghz to 3.33Ghz?
Specs:
Core 2 duo E8600 or Core 2 Quad Q8400
EVGA Gt 730 2GB GDDR5 64-bit Low Profile
4 Gigs of RAM (non upgrade-able with MOBO)
I ran Planetside 2 on High setting and the bottleneck was not my GPU but rather my CPU, turning all settings to Low made FPS WORSE. I had no parked cores on the quad.
Rift just got low FPS in general.
Tera had a barely playable 19-30 FPS and characters struggled to render at all, especially in big cities with lots of characters.
I can't overclock.