Hey y'all, I'm trying to build a system for gaming, rendering, game dev, and 3d modeling. My CPU is going to be either a 12900k or 12400kf (with a RTX 3090 Ti).
I've been looking into ram and though I would go for DDR4 and 2x16GB, with a speed of 3600 and CL14 memory (I chose the G.Skill TridentZ RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 CL14 Memory).
But when I added the ram to my build (on PCPartPicker) I got a warning that the operating voltage of the memory (1.45 V) exceeded the recommended maximum of the Intel Alder Lake CPU (1.35 V):
So I thought, easy—I'll just find a different stick of memory with 1.35 V while still maintain a speed of 3600 and CL14 memory. Wrong! It seems like at the lower voltage I have to sacrifice either speed or CL memory.
For example, the best sticks that I could find the the G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 Memory (keeps the speed but losses CL) and G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 CL14 Memory (maintains most of the CL but losses a lot of speed).
Is it better to shoot for speed vs CL memory? Or to buy the original stick (PCPartPicker said, "This memory module may run at a reduced clock rate to meet the 1350 mv voltage recommendation, or may require running at a voltage greater than the Intel recommended maximum.")? But would using ram with a higher voltage be worse than just taking the hit and buying cheaper ram?
Price isn't too much of an issue, and I wasn't really planning on overclocking at all.
I'm pretty new to memory and just don't want to bottleneck anything unnecessarily.
Thank you so much for your help!
I've been looking into ram and though I would go for DDR4 and 2x16GB, with a speed of 3600 and CL14 memory (I chose the G.Skill TridentZ RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 CL14 Memory).
But when I added the ram to my build (on PCPartPicker) I got a warning that the operating voltage of the memory (1.45 V) exceeded the recommended maximum of the Intel Alder Lake CPU (1.35 V):
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/14da1/14da11ebd7df26c832541aebc5dd983296d5715b" alt="4QpOd7p.png"
So I thought, easy—I'll just find a different stick of memory with 1.35 V while still maintain a speed of 3600 and CL14 memory. Wrong! It seems like at the lower voltage I have to sacrifice either speed or CL memory.
For example, the best sticks that I could find the the G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3600 CL16 Memory (keeps the speed but losses CL) and G.Skill Trident Z RGB 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 CL14 Memory (maintains most of the CL but losses a lot of speed).
Is it better to shoot for speed vs CL memory? Or to buy the original stick (PCPartPicker said, "This memory module may run at a reduced clock rate to meet the 1350 mv voltage recommendation, or may require running at a voltage greater than the Intel recommended maximum.")? But would using ram with a higher voltage be worse than just taking the hit and buying cheaper ram?
Price isn't too much of an issue, and I wasn't really planning on overclocking at all.
I'm pretty new to memory and just don't want to bottleneck anything unnecessarily.
Thank you so much for your help!
Last edited: