This isn't a question about some piece of hardware I currently have. It's more of a hypothetical question.
When a USB hub has multiple devices connected to it, it splits the bandwidth accordingly. So two USB devices plugged into a hub won't quite the the full bandwidth of a single device plugged into the port.
In the case of USB 3.0, they added the 5 additional wires to increase bandwidth. In a USB 3.0 hub, the data is distributed as I said before.
But what about USB 2.0 devices plugged into a USB 3.0 hub? From what I understand, it just uses the 4 main pins, and distributes the 480Mbps across all the devices.
But why not have the Hub distribute the USB 2.0 signals across the USB 3.0 bus? The way I figure, you could have 10 USB 2.0 devices running at full 480Mbps, for a total of 4,800Mbps, then have the hub communicate with the computer on the 5Gbps USB 3.0 bus.
Is this something they do yet/already? The way I figure, that would be one of the most widespread uses of USB 3.0 because it can use the extra speed to connect a plethura of existing 2.0 devices.
When a USB hub has multiple devices connected to it, it splits the bandwidth accordingly. So two USB devices plugged into a hub won't quite the the full bandwidth of a single device plugged into the port.
In the case of USB 3.0, they added the 5 additional wires to increase bandwidth. In a USB 3.0 hub, the data is distributed as I said before.
But what about USB 2.0 devices plugged into a USB 3.0 hub? From what I understand, it just uses the 4 main pins, and distributes the 480Mbps across all the devices.
But why not have the Hub distribute the USB 2.0 signals across the USB 3.0 bus? The way I figure, you could have 10 USB 2.0 devices running at full 480Mbps, for a total of 4,800Mbps, then have the hub communicate with the computer on the 5Gbps USB 3.0 bus.
Is this something they do yet/already? The way I figure, that would be one of the most widespread uses of USB 3.0 because it can use the extra speed to connect a plethura of existing 2.0 devices.