I've been reading alot on the Value ram which people are saying oc's so well. I figured there is some misleading information mixed in with the good information.
Its all FSB, the reason that they are getting high overclocks with value ram(which is really sweet) is because they are lowering the actual FSB so when it is oced the FSB is not as high as with expensive overclocking memory. So in some games where the game is strictly graphics bound it will run the same as the Expensive system, but other games where it is processor and memory intensive the more expensive ram will be faster, while the value ram system may have same CPU oc it does not have the same FSB oc or latency settings(which have a significant affect on A64 systems) which will limit its performance. So saying the overclockers ram is a waste of money is not true. You are getting a noticeable benifit from it, its like buying CPU's, haveing the fastest is going to cost 2x more than haveing the second fastest and in most cases you wouldn't notice, but there are some where it is deffinately noticeable if you are running close to the 60 FPS barrier, that extra performance could keep you from going under 60. So i think it would be fair to say that the value ram is like the 6800 Gt, its the best bang for your buck, but not the absolute fastest and the overclockers ram is like the X850XT, in alot of games you would not notice a huge difference, but there are those few exceptions where you'll be praised for haveing it. Hay, i have the "waste of money" expensive overclockers ram, so I must defend it when its criticized.
Asus A8V Deluxe(rev. 2.00) / A64 3000@2.4(266FSB, Mult. 9x) / 1024mb OCZ DDR533 / BFG 6800GT@405/1100 / Baracuda 120GB / Lian-Li PC-65 / Syncmaster 700NF / Antech True 380<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Captain_insano on 01/24/05 02:03 PM.</EM></FONT></P>
Its all FSB, the reason that they are getting high overclocks with value ram(which is really sweet) is because they are lowering the actual FSB so when it is oced the FSB is not as high as with expensive overclocking memory. So in some games where the game is strictly graphics bound it will run the same as the Expensive system, but other games where it is processor and memory intensive the more expensive ram will be faster, while the value ram system may have same CPU oc it does not have the same FSB oc or latency settings(which have a significant affect on A64 systems) which will limit its performance. So saying the overclockers ram is a waste of money is not true. You are getting a noticeable benifit from it, its like buying CPU's, haveing the fastest is going to cost 2x more than haveing the second fastest and in most cases you wouldn't notice, but there are some where it is deffinately noticeable if you are running close to the 60 FPS barrier, that extra performance could keep you from going under 60. So i think it would be fair to say that the value ram is like the 6800 Gt, its the best bang for your buck, but not the absolute fastest and the overclockers ram is like the X850XT, in alot of games you would not notice a huge difference, but there are those few exceptions where you'll be praised for haveing it. Hay, i have the "waste of money" expensive overclockers ram, so I must defend it when its criticized.
Asus A8V Deluxe(rev. 2.00) / A64 3000@2.4(266FSB, Mult. 9x) / 1024mb OCZ DDR533 / BFG 6800GT@405/1100 / Baracuda 120GB / Lian-Li PC-65 / Syncmaster 700NF / Antech True 380<P ID="edit"><FONT SIZE=-1><EM>Edited by Captain_insano on 01/24/05 02:03 PM.</EM></FONT></P>