Vampire without Clan!

Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
G

Guest

Guest
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

The next preview seems to be a Clanless vampire, not a caitif,
Clanless, without the clan symbol, what could that be? a Ghoul maybe?
It's written on it TBA: New, not a new rule, nor a rule update?
What the hell could this be?
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

"Omael" <omael.rangel@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1108266083.265884.270840@o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> The next preview seems to be a Clanless vampire, not a caitif,
> Clanless, without the clan symbol, what could that be? a Ghoul maybe?
> It's written on it TBA: New, not a new rule, nor a rule update?
> What the hell could this be?

I think you're confusing its proximity to the words, "TBA: New", which
has been there since the beginning. That is, it just happens to be
directly over "TBA: New", which is next in line to be revealed after
this vampire is revealed (if I recall correctly and assuming they
hold to pattern, of course). That would happen on Tuesday.

Presumedly, this new clanless vampire (if that's the explanation for
the lack of any discernable clan symbol) is a totally separate
revelation from "TBA: New".

Or not. 🙂

Fred, hoping they'll give out free tickets to the LARP party for the
first 9 callers...
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Eyes without a face....

C'mon man. Get real. The B&W of the vamp don't show its clan symbol
so well. That's all.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Looks like a !Gangrel to me, disciplines (ani) (for) (OBF) (PRO). Can't
read name, text or capacity, though.


Regards,

Patrick
Columbus, OH
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

"DJ Feng Shui" <dj_feng_shui@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<1108280573.102541.206450@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>...
> Eyes without a face....
>
> C'mon man. Get real. The B&W of the vamp don't show its clan symbol
> so well. That's all.

It's definetly a Baali, you can see a small black circle where the
clan symbol is supposed to be.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> The next preview seems to be a Clanless vampire, not a caitif,
Clanless, without the clan symbol, what could that be? a Ghoul maybe?
It's written on it TBA: New, not a new rule, nor a rule update?
What the hell could this be?



its a baali...
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Omael wrote:
> The next preview seems to be a Clanless vampire, not a caitif,
> Clanless, without the clan symbol, what could that be? a Ghoul maybe?
> It's written on it TBA: New, not a new rule, nor a rule update?
> What the hell could this be?

Kuei-jin?

Dan
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

I think that vampire is Valerius Maior, Hell's Fool, and the clan
symbol is obfuscated due to the fact its advanced version (in some
manner, as Pethaniqua being a TBA vampire). The new rule announcement
would be related to this, but I have no idea what could it be.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

The striations on the background of the card don't match any of the
clans shown, so I'm guessing Giovanni. Say NEC, OBF, pot, ani. That's
my two cents.

Deq
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

i´ll side to this. the Giovanni clan symbol is also one of the few
dark ones (not as dark as the baali, naturally, but all the thin lines
kindda disappear in low-res/b&w preview images...), and also, it´s
square, and i don´t see any black circle where the clan symbol should
be (afterall, if they use photoshop to create the final version of the
cards,it´s just so easy to set a layer as invisible...and the same
goes for almost every other pro image editting software), but rather a
lack of any markings, so that would be my guess... and it really scared
me when i checked the preview and there was no clan symbol there...

name-wise, the giovanni have a few ons that could match:

Almodo Giovanni
Ambrogino ADV (but i don´t think so ´cause of the image we saw
spoilled earlier)
Carmine Giovanni
Cristobal Ghiberti
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Omael wrote:

> The next preview seems to be a Clanless vampire, not a caitif,
> Clanless, without the clan symbol, what could that be? a Ghoul maybe?
> It's written on it TBA: New, not a new rule, nor a rule update?
> What the hell could this be?

My suspition is that it's just a regular vampire that's had its clan
symbol removed or Über-jumbled for the sake of the preview... It's got
OBF, but have this odd feeling that it's going to be a Giovanni.

Then again, those WW folks have surprised me in the past.

Derek Rawlings
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Let's start a pool! I'm buying into Cristobal Ghiberti.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> > The next preview seems to be a Clanless vampire, not a caitif,
> > Clanless, without the clan symbol, what could that be? a Ghoul maybe?
> > It's written on it TBA: New, not a new rule, nor a rule update?
> > What the hell could this be?
>
> My suspition is that it's just a regular vampire that's had its clan
> symbol removed or Über-jumbled for the sake of the preview... It's got
> OBF, but have this odd feeling that it's going to be a Giovanni.
>
> Then again, those WW folks have surprised me in the past.
>

It's possible the Clan Symbol is there, but really hard to see. Remember
how the Giovanni Clan cards looked in Ancient Hearts?
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> My suspition is that it's just a regular vampire that's had its clan
> symbol removed or Über-jumbled for the sake of the preview... It's got
> OBF, but have this odd feeling that it's going to be a Giovanni.
>
> Then again, those WW folks have surprised me in the past.
>
> Derek Rawlings

Unfortunately, I would bet on Cagliostro, The Grand Copht. But we've
already seen a Setite, so it would seem strange...

----------
Orpheus, eager to know what this extension will bring to his favourite clan.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> Unfortunately, I would bet on Cagliostro, The Grand Copht. But we've
> already seen a Setite, so it would seem strange...

I just want it to be a Giovanni for you, Orph... It's way past due...

Derek Rawlings
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> Ambrogino ADV (but i don´t think so ´cause of the image we saw
> spoilled earlier)

I think the lack of (Adv) symbol is telling.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

Frederick Scott wrote:
> I think you're confusing its proximity to the words, "TBA: New", which
> has been there since the beginning.

Yeah, but so far the middle card in each row has been in some way
related to the rule below it. Maureen - new Infernal rule, Red List -
Red List rule, Michael DiCarlo - new Blood Curse rule and Trophy -
Trophy rule, so I'd dare guess that the TBA: New has something to do
with the soon-to-be-revealed vampire.

Or not. :)

--CV
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On 13 Feb 2005 00:48:55 -0800, samyamu@gmail.com wrote:

>Looks like a !Gangrel to me, disciplines (ani) (for) (OBF) (PRO). Can't
>read name, text or capacity, though.
>Regards,
>Patrick
>Columbus, OH

To me it seems [ani] [pot] [OBF] [SER] with it's clan symbol
deliberately blurred. Otherwise it's a Baali - theirs is one of the
few clan symbols to be black instead of white... as far as I remember.

best,

Fabio "Sooner" Macedo
V:TES National Coordinator for Brazil
-----------------------------------------------------
now a "luminary", whatever it means:
http://www.thelasombra.com/WhosWho/fabiomacedo.htm
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> Gregory said:
> I think the lack of (Adv) symbol is telling.

well, the lack of clan is telling too, ain´t it??


> deqlan@sanguinis.net wrote:
> Let's start a pool! I'm buying into Cristobal Ghiberti.

i´ll side with you....
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

"DenAlex" <alexander.schrijvers@pandora.be> wrote in message
news:855f46a7.0502130214.47093905@posting.google.com...
> "DJ Feng Shui" <dj_feng_shui@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:<1108280573.102541.206450@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com>...
>> Eyes without a face....
>>
>> C'mon man. Get real. The B&W of the vamp don't show its clan symbol
>> so well. That's all.
>
> It's definetly a Baali, you can see a small black circle where the
> clan symbol is supposed to be.

#1. I cannot see anything that looks like a small black circle or anything
the slightest bit like a Baali clan circle. Even making allowances for the
blurriness, I don't think there's a Baali clan symbol there, no.

#2. The background is not the same as the Baali background.

Fred
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> Also, there are some unnamed Vampires after Valerius x2. Finally, note
> that there are more than 50 vampires (52 at current count). So that
> allegation was at least disproved.

There are 8 Starter-Only Vampires and 50 Booster Vampires.

> But my prediction, based on nothing more than a hunch at this point,
> assuming it's not something new and unique, is that it's Alexis Sorokin.
> He just looks like an Alexis. And Ravnos also have a fairly dark clan
> signature.
>

Isn't Alexis Sorokin a woman?
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> While Alexis tends to be a female dominant name in the Western world,
> in Eastern Europe, depending on tradition, Alexi/Alexis is a not
> uncommon male name. Granted, you might be right in this instance,
> especially if there is an Alexis in the KMW book.
>

Yes, I know. The last Tsarevich was named Alexis. Nevertheless, I believe
*this* Alexis is a woman.
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

"Derek Rawlings" <dmrawlings@telus.net> a écrit dans le message de news:
420F3BD9.B0E83B6@telus.net...
> > Unfortunately, I would bet on Cagliostro, The Grand Copht. But we've
> > already seen a Setite, so it would seem strange...
>
> I just want it to be a Giovanni for you, Orph... It's way past due...

LOL. Thanks Derek.

Yes, it would be unfair that only one indie clan, the BEST of them without
any possible doubt 😉 stayed out of the previews.

On the other hand, the thing I want to know will not be revealed by the
previews : are there enough good new Giovanni / Nec / Indie / Anarch cards
to offer real new possibilities for my Famiglia ?

Sure hope so.
-----------
Orpheus
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

On 13 Feb 2005 00:48:55 -0800, samyamu@gmail.com wrote:

>Looks like a !Gangrel to me, disciplines (ani) (for) (OBF) (PRO). Can't
>read name, text or capacity, though.

It's definately [ani]. And [OBF]. But that second attribute isn't
[for], and the fouth is definately not [PRO]. Compare to Mitra.
They're nothing alike. Closest I can tell, the second trait looks a
lot like [pot] when compared to Annis. And given the 'right side' bias
of the final superior, it looks most similar to Serpentis (or maybe
Melon-pony). No FoS matches it name wise, however (two long names).

Morgan Vening
 
Archived from groups: rec.games.trading-cards.jyhad (More info?)

> Then again, those WW folks have surprised me in the past.

....and do once more... No one could have seen Allonzo coming.

Well... Orpheus will have to stay on the edge of his seat for a Gio-treat.
:)

Derek Rawlings
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Latest posts

Moderators online

Share this page

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom